CE CUP FINAL – Vipers The Ones That History Will Remember

“The history books never mention the losers,” said Steve McManaman on comms during the Men’s Champions League final last night. He took a bit of stick for it on social media, but in context (i.e. sporting history) it’s true, isn’t it? Vipers retained the Charlotte Edwards cup in emphatic style at Worcester today; and no one will remember that it was Blaze who topped the table with a massive 31 points – 9 more than Vipers; and it was Blaze who won 7 games out of 7 in the group stages, while Vipers won just 5 and lost 2.

In a sense, it is a massively unfair result – Blaze were so dominant in the group stages and if anyone deserved something from the day, it was them; but trophies in this game aren’t awarded for group stages. Whilst this was Blaze’s first final since Lightning (as they then were) made the KSL final in 2018, that was the last year that Vipers didn’t make a finals day, and they have now won 4 of the 6 trophies available since the inception of regionals in 2020. That experience really told at Worcester over the past 2 days.

With Anya Shrubsole leading Vipers onto the field last night, speculation was rife that this signified her final game for the club, and she tearfully confirmed as much in the post-match interview as she received the Payer of the Match medal, having bowled Vipers into an essentially unassailable position prior to the rains last night, with Blaze 53-4 after 9.3 overs. On another occasion, Danni Wyatt (50 off 28 balls) might have argued with that Player of the Match award, but she had already bagged one bottle of champagne English sparkling wine this weekend for her performance in the semi-final, and besides… this was Anya’s day.

Blaze’s only hope was to come out all guns… er… blazing this morning. If they had been able to add another 100 runs, they might have made a game of it, but they struggled to find the boundary. Marie Kelly finished as their top scorer with an all-run 26 – no 4s or 6s at all. Given the deluge of rain yesterday, and the fact that the water table apparently remains very high at Worcester for the time of year, we wondered if perhaps the outfield had just slowed-up; but the first two overs of Vipers’ innings quickly put that idea to bed – Wyatt running riot of Grace Ballinger in the 2nd over, taking her for 17 runs. They didn’t quite maintain that pace, but by the end of the powerplay, they were already more than half-way home.

By the time they lost the wickets of Maia Bouchier in the 7th over, it was already essentially done and dusted as a contest. Ella McCaughan called Danni Wyatt through for a quick single, but Wyatt basically just shook her head and held her hand up, as if to say: “Chill, kiddo – we got this!”

Freya Kemp looked like Freya Kemp again for the first time since her partial comeback from injury, playing as a pure batter – effortlessly crashing Lucy Higham to the boundary for a consecutive 6 and 4 on her way to 13 off 8 balls; but it was left to Georgia Adams, later named Player of the Tournament, to hit the winning runs and start the celebrations.

When Australia won the T20 World Cup in South Africa a few months ago, some commented that their celebrations seemed muted – as if their senses had been dulled by so many trophy wins in the past few years. There was no such reticence from Vipers today – they enjoyed this one as much as any of the others. They might have lost 3 games already this season. They might have had a panic over the wicket-keeping role. But they are the Charlotte Edwards Cup champions again, and that’s all that history will remember.

CE CUP: Batting Rankings – Life Of Bryony

When Bryony Smith made her ODI debut in June 2019, having played a few T20s the previous summer, I wrote a piece suggesting that then-coach Mark Robinson might have solved a big problem for England by finding a role for her which really fitted – as a bowling allrounder who could seriously hit a ball.

But Robinson himself clearly wasn’t convinced – it remains the only ODI she has played, and she didn’t win another T20 cap either until last summer. She won 5 more caps in 2022 under Lisa Keightley, but Keightley didn’t seem entirely sure what her role was either – initially selecting her to bat at 3, then bumping her down the order after Alice Capsey came onto the scene. She was then dropped completely for a winter which included the T20 World Cup, and didn’t even make the cut as Capsey’s understudy, with Dani Gibson named as the reserve for South Africa.

At Stars, however, her role has been very clear for a while: come in opening-up and use the powerplay to hit over the top – get the first punch in, leaving the opposition dazed and confused in the dust. It doesn’t always work – she is out caught a lot – but this season she seems to have added a bit more oomph to a game that was already power-heavy. The numbers speak for themselves – leading run-scorer, and the 2nd highest strike rate in the comp*.

(* Minimum 25 balls faced – the “real” highest strike rate is Freya Davies – 200, consisting of 8 off 4 deliveries faced.)

Might another England call-up – which would feel almost like a third debut – now be on the cards for Smith? It would have to be in that powerplay role – that’s her game – and Sophia Dunkley and Danni Wyatt both look quite established in those opening slots, but if one of them should fall by the wayside (and Wyatt is obviously closer to the end of her career than the beginning of it) Smith is now the obvious choice.

Getting back to the rankings, Nat Sciver-Brunt comes in 2nd, despite having only played 4 games. It feels like a long time since we’ve been able to say an Englishwoman is the Best Player in the World™ and an English player has never won Wisden‘s Leading Woman Cricketer in the World, but no one has been better-placed to change that than Sciver-Brunt is right now – all she needs to do is win The Ashes single-handedly and it’s hers! (Easy-as… right?)

In terms of up-and-coming players, the aforementioned Dani Gibson, cracking the top 10 at No. 9, is obviously the next player on England’s radar. Some players are “batting allrounders” and some are “bowling allrounders”, but Gibson is more that old-school “genuine allrounder”, who you’d pick as either. Moreover, she has really pushed-on over the winter, adding more power to her batting game, and a lovely slower ball to her seam-bowling armoury, and there is a good chance she’ll win a T20 cap this summer – if not against Australia then versus Sri Lanka in September.

Player Played Runs Strike Rate
1. Bryony Smith (Stars) 7 256 155
2. Nat Sciver-Brunt (Blaze) 4 194 175
3. Georgia Adams (Vipers) 7 228 126
4. Holly Armitage (Diamonds) 7 216 129
5. Emma Lamb (Thunder) 5 196 141
6. Tammy Beaumont (Blaze) 5 187 143
7. Erin Burns (Sparks) 7 185 141
8. Phoebe Franklin (Stars) 7 196 121
9. Dani Gibson (Storm) 6 166 142
10. Georgie Boyce (Blaze) 7 179 127

Ranking = Runs * Strike Rate

CE CUP: Bowling Rankings – Tick Tock On de Klerk, But The Party Don’t Stop!

During the first 3 seasons of regionals, overseas signings in the RHF Trophy and CE Cup felt somewhat ad-hoc; but increased budgets this year have meant players being signed for longer blocks on a more strategic basis. While some teams have gone down the route of hiring internationally retired superstars, such as Deandra Dottin at Thunder and Dane van Niekerk at Sunrisers (neither of whom have set the summer on fire), others have opted for utility all-rounders, like Erin Burns at Sparks and Nadine de Klerk at Blaze.

Neither Burns nor de Klerk are anywhere near superstar territory – Burns has won just 6 caps in a lengthy career, and while de Klerk has played 60-odd, she had a poor World Cup, taking just 2 wickets and finishing the competition as her side’s most expensive bowler. And yet… here we are – de Klerk finishes the group stages of the CE Cup as its leading bowler, having taken 14 wickets at an Economy Rate under 6, with Burns also making the top 10.

The one semi-retired superstar who has had a successful CE Cup is Anya Shrubsole – with Vipers missing key players throughout the competition due to England red-ball warm-ups ahead of the Ashes, their player-coach has stepped-up with 9 wickets, to keep their campaign alive into Finals Day.

The other key player keeping Vipers hanging in there (and compared with previous seasons, it has been a case of “hanging in”) has been Linsey Smith, who ranks 2nd with a tournament-leading economy rate of 4.89, despite having bowled a lot of overs in the powerplay. (And amazingly, that tournament-leading economy rate for once doesn’t need to be caveated with “minimum x overs bowled” – it is actually the real leading rate!)

In terms of future prospects 20-year old Grace Hall, in her first season with Diamonds, might be one to keep an eye on, having out-bowled a lot of bigger names to make it into the top 10. She isn’t super-quick, but with a slingy, almost round-arm action and (appropriately enough for a true-born Yorkshire lass) a great yorker, she offers something a bit different which England might want to be taking an interest in, in the near future.

Player Played Wickets Economy
1. Nadine de Klerk (Blaze) 7 14 5.84
2. Linsey Smith (Vipers) 7 10 4.89
3. Katie Levick (Diamonds) 7 12 6.26
4. Anya Shrubsole (Vipers) 6 9 5.61
5. Mady Villiers (Sunrisers) 7 10 6.36
6. Georgia Davis (Sparks) 7 8 6.00
7. Tara Norris (Thunder) 7 9 7.32
8. Bethan Ellis (Sparks) 5 9 7.34
9. Grace Hall (Diamonds) 7 10 8.22
10. Erin Burns (Sparks) 7 9 7.69

Ranking = Wickets / Economy

The CRICKETher Weekly – Episode 167

This week:

  • Who’s on track for CE Cup Finals Day?
  • Our take on THAT Thea Brookes interview
  • Where the PCA gets it wrong
  • Syd has a bonkers idea about Bryony Smith… & an excellent one about women’s county cricket

 

MATCH REPORT: Storm v Sparks – Prendergast Channels Bristol Breeze to Guide Storm Home

On a breezy day at Bristol, Storm cruised to a win which was ultimately far easier than the 4-ball margin on the scorecard would suggest.

Chasing Sparks’ 135, Storm got off to a decent start, with Dani Gibson playing some authoritative strokes early on, finding the boundary in each of the first 3 overs. Gibson has been a key player for Storm this season, but she couldn’t push on today, caught low at extra cover by Erin Burns for 18 off 14.

With Ami Campbell holding on to a difficult low chance to dismiss Nat Wraith, Sparks could have had an opening, but Storm continued to tick along at just over 8 an over, reaching 51-2 at the end of the powerplay with Fran Wilson having taken over from Gibson as the playmaker.

With Irish allrounder Orla Prendergast in tow, Wilson guided Storm to 77-2 at 10 overs, gradually whittling down the rate as she dinked it all around the ground in the manner of… well… Fran Wilson.

Prendergast should have been caught on 20, skying an easy chance to deep mid on, only for Georgia Davis to misjudge it horrendously coming out of the midday sun, shrivelling in embarrassment as it plopped onto the turf a yard behind her.

The partnership between Wilson and Prendergast yielded 57 runs before Wilson’s innings came to an end for 34, stumped coming down the track to Hannah Baker, easily Sparks’ standout bowler on the day.

The runs dried up a bit without Wilson’s impetus, but this was partly achieved by Sparks bowling-out trump-card Hannah Baker, turning the required 21 off the final 4 overs into something of a formality.

Sparks had a couple of opportunities to keep it interesting – a chance to stump Luff off Georgia Davis went begging, and Luff was also dropped off the first ball of the final over; but Prendergast then guided the next delivery over the ring into the vacant outfield to bring up the winning runs, the Irish international finishing 46* off 43 balls.

Sparks (who, at time of writing, are not mathematically out of the tournament, but are very close to being so) will take the positives from a productive (if chancy!) knock of 22 off 23 from Davina Perrin and a highly professional 66 off 45 balls from Aussie veteran Erin Burns.

Perrin had her first little bit of luck on 6 when a lofted drive passed inches from Sophia Smale’s outstretched right hand as it went for 4; and was then horribly dropped by Smale the following delivery. She continued to live a charmed life playing largely over the infield, until finally caught on the ring by Chloe Skelton for 22 off 23.

At the half-way mark, Sparks were 57-3 and staring down the barrel at a somewhat sub-par total. But with Burns on 17 having faced just 14 deliveries, there was an opportunity to build something defendable, and it was an opportunity Burns took, putting on 66 with Abi Freeborn.

Neither found the boundary as much as they might have liked, but both ran hard between the wickets to make up for it – going into the death overs at 99-3 with the chance to capitalise on their wickets in hand. Burns’ innings ended on the second ball of the final over but a strong death phase took them to 135 and gave them something to bowl at, albeit ultimately not quite enough.

The win keeps Storm’s slim hopes of reaching Finals Day alive, though this may change with 3 other matches completing later today.

WOMEN’S ASHES: Come Back With Your Shield – Or On It!

By Andy Frombolton

As Sun Tzu notes in ‘The Art of War’: “A military force has no constant formation, water has no constant shape. The ability to gain victory by changing and adapting according to the opponent is called genius.”

Hence for England to have any chance in the forthcoming Women’s Ashes, team selection needs to take account of the very different skills required across the 3 formats.

Playing against a formidable opposition can bring out the best in some players; whilst for others it exposes their limits. Compare these 2 tables. (Green colouring indicates improved stats compared to performances against all other teams; red means the opposite.)

With the exception of Healy in T20s and McGrath in ODIs, the best Australian players maintain or improve their performances when playing their biggest rivals, England. (Perry’s ‘underperformance’ in ODIs means her performances against England have merely been ‘very good’, not ‘exceptional’.)

    T20 ODI
    Bat Bowl Bat Bowl
    Av SR Av SR Av SR Av ER
Healy vs England 16 103     37 96    
vs Others 28 134     37 75    
Mooney vs England 47 137     56 88    
vs Others 40 122     52 75    
Perry vs England 35 106 24 21 43 80 27 4.5
vs Others 29 115 17 19 53 57 24 4.3
McGrath vs England 186 11 10 20 63 23 4.5
vs Others 52 137 21 16 39 71 43 5.7
Schutt vs England     16 15     20 3.9
vs Others     16 16     25 4.3
                   
                 
    T20 ODI
    Bat Bowl Bat Bowl
    Av SR Av SR Av SR Av ER
Knight vs Australia 15 107     29 67    
vs Others 25 118     39 74    
Jones vs Australia 10 74     9 55    
vs Others 25 128     31 82    
Wyatt vs Australia 21 122     11 65    
vs Others 22 126     27 91    
Beaumont vs Australia 18 96     35 73    
vs Others 25 111     42 73    
Winfield-Hill vs Australia 15 98     12 52    
vs Others 22 110     25 61    
Sciver-Brunt vs Australia 24 106 24 19 52 87 41 5.7
vs Others 27 118 21 21 43 128 28 4.1
Cross vs Australia     53 39     57 5.2
vs Others     21 21     20 4.2
Ecclestone vs Australia     21 18     49 4.6
vs Others     14 15     18 3.4
Glenn vs Australia     17 13    
vs Others     17 17     23 4.1

Already however the England contracted players are being incrementally withdrawn from the CEC in order to prepare for the Women’s Ashes – notwithstanding that many have looked considerably undercooked in their outings and could benefit from more competitive match practice – indicating that England plans to select their various squads from this cohort over the coming contest.

Quite simply however, England cannot afford to field teams containing players whose limitations have been brutally exposed by this all-vanquishing opposition. To do so, and expect better results than last time, would be madness.

This isn’t to advocate a wholesale replacement of the centrally-contracted cohort, but – particularly in the T20 format – many lack the 360-degree batting skills, fielding agility or bowling variations which the modern game requires.

Instead, what could be achieved by a team comprising the best of the central cohort and an influx of players unburdened by past failures and inspired by an unexpected call up? (And if this team loses? There’s no more points of offer for the magnitude of a win or loss!)

This would necessitate some difficult conversations and some potentially-embarrassing outcomes if centrally-contracted players aren’t picked, but Jon Lewis has already demonstrated that he isn’t going to be bound by the decisions or selection choices of his predecessors. Nor should he feel uncomfortable if he has to go outside of the England contracted players to assemble what he deems to be his best team. This is about trying to win the Women’s Ashes, not individual egos.

Based on performances so far this year, Bess Heath, Bryony Smith, Katie Levick, Danni Gibson and Holly Armitage need to be told that if they continue to perform over the next few weeks then an England call-up awaits.