ENGLAND v INDIA TEST: Day 3 – TalkSport

Prior to this Test match there was a lot of discussion on social media about whether BBC’s Test Match Special would broadcast live coverage of the game, and subsequent disappointment when it transpired that they would not, after TalkSport won the rights for the men’s Tests next year, with which the rights to the women’s Test were bundled.

The universal assumption, given that the match was hours from starting, was that it would pass without full radio coverage in the UK – the first England Test to do so for a decade. So massive credit to TalkSport for upending that assumption, and pulling together a team to commentate remotely on the final two days [insert hindsight here] of the match from their headquarters beneath The Shard on London’s South Bank.

Raf got a message from the producer whilst she was teaching her Sports Journalism students at Bournemouth University and got on a train; Phoebe Graham got a call when she was training with Thunder in Manchester and got into her car. Less than 24 hours later we found ourselves walking together at 3:30am (coffees and Google Maps in hand) with revellers still spilling out of clubs and pubs from the night before, trekking 10 minutes from our hotel at London Bridge over to TalkSport to… talk sport – and of course one sport in particular!

The setup is not really too different to watching from home – you are sat in a small conference room, in front of a huge screen, showing the “raw” TV feed from the ground – so you are seeing the same pictures that everyone watching on TNT is seeing in their living rooms, but without the comms or any ads. You can hear the effects mic, so you get a sense of the atmosphere, but you are at the mercy of the TV producer as to what you actually see.

It is virtually impossible to follow who is fielding where, and you won’t know a sub fielder has entered the fray until suddenly Harleen Deol or Richa Gosh pop up; but you obviously get a prime view of every delivery – much more so than if you were at the ground, where the most you’ll have is a small screen to catch a replay on.

With it being an early start, we’d brought a round of croissants with us to have for breakfast during the “lunch” break. Not just any croissants either – M&S croissants! And they did get eaten, but not during the lunch break, because there was, dear reader, no lunch break, as England were bowled out for 130-something for the second time in two days.

Of course, this isn’t the first time England have lost a Test match this year; but against Australia in the Women’s Ashes, it felt like they were competing. They fought. They took it to a fifth day. They came within 100 runs of victory. None of those caveats were applicable here. The cavernous DY Patil stadium in Navi Mumbai is 4,500 miles from Trent Bridge; but it might as well have been 4,500 light years.

Having opted not to enforce the follow-on yesterday, everyone expected India to continue batting this morning, at least whilst Harmanpreet was still at the crease; but the Indians surprised everyone by declaring on their overnight lead of 478.

Given that no one has ever chased even 200 to win a women’s Test, let alone nearly 500, the odds were very much stacked against England. But it is the commentator’s job to be optimistic about the state of the game, even at 4am on a chilly winter’s morning in south London, so we gave England the benefit of the doubt – if they could battle their way through today, and take into the final day, they’d have a chance to at least redeem their embarrassment at being bowled out for 136 yesterday.

As the kids say… LOL!

There will be some debate once again about whether England were bad or India were good; and perhaps we won’t really know the answer to that question until the end of next week’s Test between India and Australia, but right now I’m leaning towards “India were good”. They batted positively on Day 1; and they bowled brilliantly on Days 2 and 3. In Renuka and Pooja, they’ve perhaps found themselves a genuine “Shrubsole and Brunt”, with Reunka swinging it in like Anya and Pooja bringing the KSB fight and aggression. Between them they did for England’s top order – Dunkley was again the architect of her own demise, guiding a half-tracker into the hands of point; but Beaumont, Knight and Sciver-Brunt all got more or less unplayable deliveries.

The spinners then took over to run through the tail, with Deepti adding another 4 wickets to the 5fer she took in England’s first dig. It is interesting to consider what Deepti’s role is in this team. Is she a batter who bowls a bit? A bowler who contributes with the bat? She’s not a classic “genuine allrounder”, in the sense of someone who would get into the team on the strength of either role. She once made a big ODI century against Ireland, and took a 6fer against Sri Lanka back in 2016; but (ignoring “The Thing”) she is generally more of a player about whom the phrase “chipped in” might be written.

This then was probably the game of her life. After making a crucial half century in India’s first innings, which took them from “this is a decent score” to “only India can win from here”, she then exploited the red cherry, and a pitch she’ll want to carry round for the rest of her life, to make the ball dance around like a prima ballerina, getting the kind of turn that I’ve only ever seen before from the very best leg-spinners in the women’s game – Amelia Kerr and Sune Luus, before she lost her mojo.

England knew they had problems against spin – hence Jon Lewis’s “Spin Camp” earlier this year. But only one of the players on that camp actually played in this match – the disastrously-out-of-nick-anyway Sophia Dunkley – so much good it did!

To be fair to England though, this was a bit of a one-off – Deepti will probably never bowl like that again, and the batters at the spin camp were being prepped for the Asian World Cups to come in the next 18 months, not this Test match. The great rugby coach Clive Woodward once said: “Judge me on the World Cup”. I’d imagine Jon Lewis will be saying something very similar when he hands his report back to his bosses at the ECB. Clive Woodward went on  to win that World Cup. If Lewis goes on to do the same, all this will be forgotten. If not…

3 thoughts on “ENGLAND v INDIA TEST: Day 3 – TalkSport

  1. I’ve been sceptical of the Lewis/Knight axis for some time (just as I have been about Mott/Buttler). I had been hoping to hear news of some illness doing the rounds that could excuse both selection and performances in this match and the T20.

    “Taking the positives” hopefully this will convince England of the quality of Charlie Dean. I’ve been a huge fan ever since I first saw her live back in 2021. Not just her skills but she’s got something extra about her that elite athletes need to succeed. She needs some help from her colleagues around her though. Sometimes our fielding looks very amateur.

    Like

  2. India good or England bad? Why not both. To me It’s a good thing that a bang average-to-poor England performance gets thoroughly punished instead of squeaking over the line. Should serve England better in the long run to not be rewarded for mediocre performance.

    Those Day 1 India batting partnerships were sooo good to watch, esp as in the past India have lost to England bowling worse than yesterday. And how good to see a full team performance; really exposed how England tend to just about get by on feats of individual brilliance more often than not lately.

    Must also echo the poster above as card carrying member of the Charlie Dean fan club, who for me has been England’s most interesting cricketer since her debut.

    Like

  3. Best case scenario: A group of players who rarely play test cricket find themselves playing test cricket in India, one of the toughest overseas assignments there is. And with no room in the schedule for preparation. And with their best bowler just returning from injury. And with several batters coming out of the WBBL in dismal form. And then they lost the toss. And India were really bloody good.

    Concerning case scenario: 12 months in to the Jon Lewis era, England look if anything worse as a batting unit. Yes, Beaumont had a glorious summer and Nat continues to be Nat. But the players who have really improved under ‘Jonball’ are bowlers: Bell, Dean and Glenn. Meanwhile, Dunkley has dropped off a cliff, Capsey has stagnated and the fringe batters have yet to show they belong.

    Worst case scenario: England have an issue with their batting technique. Nikki Chaudhuri talked about this on the Storylines pod: India still tends to relentlessly drill youngsters in technical fundamentals. In England, for pretty understandable reasons, we’ve moved away from that in a bid to keep cricket fun and to keep kids engaged. But with test match field settings, on a turning pitch and a lightning outfield, Indian batting looked a class apart. The things that give English batters the edge in T20s (size, strength, athleticism, range of shots) were little help. Instead, sound defence and an ability to time the ball were the order of the day. It’s true that test matches are rare and test matches in India even rarer. But some of these issues were apparent in the WBBL. The game is becoming more professional, bowlers are improving their skills and teams are putting resources into analysis of their opponent’s weaknesses. Could the shaky foundations of English technique become a serious problem?

    Like

Comments are closed.