ANALYSIS: Should Keepers Stand In Front Of The Stumps For Run Outs?

There is a fascinating video on the ECB’s web site which asks (and attempts to answer) the question: Should keepers stand in front or behind the stumps for run outs? (HT Joe Ashdown)

The coaches at the ECB’s performance centre up in Loughborough set up their cameras and stopwatches, and with the help of Hawk-Eye and a reconfigured bowling machine acting as the fielder, attempted to get a definitive answer.

You can watch the whole thing at the link above, but the TLDW* is that standing in front of the stumps is… well… it depends!!

The key to it… and the video actually slightly talks-around this fairly simple point… is that you have to know exactly where your stumps are – not vaguely; not roughly; but exactly!

There are two reasons for this:

  1. You need to know if the ball is already going on to directly hit the stumps, in which case you need to basically leave it alone – nothing beats the speed of the ball through the air, and if you interrupt it then you lose all the benefit of those few milliseconds you bought from standing in front.
  2. If the ball is missing the stumps, you need to be perfectly positioned to guide it on in a single movement – if you can’t do this in one smooth, gliding arc, then it actually becomes two movements and again the advantage is lost as the batsman makes their ground.

What the video shows fairly conclusively is knowing exactly where your stumps are, and perfecting the art of guiding the missing ball back on in a single arc, is really hard – even for a seasoned pro, it takes years of practice. The video’s final conclusion is that, even in the professional game, “normal” fielders at the bowler’s end (typically the bowler himself) should always stand behind the stumps; but that the very best ‘keepers could indeed buy some advantage by standing in front.

This has some interesting implications for young ‘keepers in the women’s domestic game, as it touches on the slightly awkward question of what the Women’s County Championship and Kia Super League are for? Are they competitions in their own right, where winning is all? Or does that come secondary to their other role as nurseries for future England players?

England’s Academy and pathway coaches are clearly coaching players to stand in front – and rightly so, because one day England will need one of them to step into the gloves [Ed: err…?] of Sarah Taylor.

But for a young ‘keeper playing the County Championship or KSL, if the goal is to win “this” match right now, they should probably be standing behind, because this is the optimal choice unless you’ve had the years of professional practice to perfect the techniques required to stand in front… which the young (at best, semi-pro) ‘keepers in domestic cricket have not!

It isn’t only wicket keepers who face these dilemmas. Should a young fast bowler, hoping one day to be bowling out the Aussies in the Women’s Ashes, focus on pace, even if it means conceding a few wides or no balls? Her England pathway coach would no doubt say yes; but her county coach might well prefer her to take a foot off the gas and keep the runs down in “this” match going on right now!

To be fair, these same issues arise as well in The Other Game but that is what they have 2nd XI cricket for. We have no real equivalent, and so the County Champs and Super League play both roles – competition and nursery – and that means there is no easy answer.


* TLDW – Too Long; Didn’t Watch


3 thoughts on “ANALYSIS: Should Keepers Stand In Front Of The Stumps For Run Outs?

  1. An argument that could run and run…

    Firstly I don’t feel the KSL can ever really prepare cricketers for international cricket – why? – because its format is T20. In TOG and also in the women’s game, the best exponents of T20 learned their trade in the 50-over form of the game and I notice a development tour scheduled in the near future wisely includes more 50-over than T20. Thus I would argue there can’t be any question that the object in the KSL is to win the game and keepers should stand where they feel their skill level gives them the best chance. Only today, thanks to the miracle of TV, I have watched a player in an international match (from TOG) miss a relatively easy run out by not knowing precisely where his stumps were.

    I’d go further and say I feel a match of any description is not training. The object should always be to play to win not play to practice!

    In any event, if it takes a stop watch to determine which is the best method then it will only matter in televised matches where a replay is available and that is not, and is never likely to be, most women’s cricket.

    Unless you feel you have another player who may have Sarah Taylor’s skill in due time, don’t try and be ‘flash’. Most cricket matches are won by doing the basics well. Stick to that.


  2. Good observations by Syd at last back up what I have thought since the keepers began taking in front of the stumps.
    It works in favour of the fielding team once or twice in a hundred. Quite often attempted run outs fail due to the ball being taken, or attempting deflection, when the ball would have been a direct hit. If taking the ball in front were to work all the time then go for it, but I do not think it does.
    I also believe there are some selections in the second string and England academy set up which are hopeful ones.
    Meaning there is raw, inconsistent talent needing coaching and nurturing, rather than rewarding outstanding, consistent talent shown by a few other young players who seem to have missed the England boat.
    However, let us hope they can state their claims further in just a few weeks time when the seasonal warm ups begin. As long as the snow has gone….!


  3. Nice thoughtful article, your conclusions about standing in front of the stumps seem to make sense to me. I think women’s domestic cricket competitions have done well to develop the players they have, and although the winning may have been important to those involved, the news of their success or failure hardly reached the ears of the masses as much as it has since the inception of the KSL.

    The KSL can try both jobs to some extent, although the potential for development is reasonably limited. Most of all it’s an elite competition with bigger media impact than what’s come before, and that demands that the main focus will be results.


Comments are closed.