Prior to this match, England had played 184 T20 internationals, and had been bowled out in just 15 of them. They’d only been bowled out in consecutive matches twice – in 2011 (both to Australia) and 2018 (to Australia and India). Add Sri Lanka in 2023 to that list now.
And it goes without saying that when you’re bowled out, you almost always lose the game in international T20 cricket – England haven’t won a T20 in which they were bowled out since 2011, back in the days when 120 was a pretty good score. Unsurprisingly, that didn’t change this evening in Derby.
England were pretty abject from the first ball, when Danni Wyatt prodded a catch to cover as if she was still taking throw-downs before the start of game. Alice Capsey looked like she might be in the mood; but within 2 overs the only “mood” she was in was a stroppy one, having been hung out to dry by Maia Bouchier.
Bouch needed to make up for it big-time and she played some sumptuous strokes along the floor to get herself a start. Her 23 off 18 balls ended up being England’s highest score, but it could have been more, and it should have been more. There was no need to suddenly go aerial, and she didn’t get anything like enough power through the ball – sending it straight to the fielder on the long-on boundary.
And it was all downhill from there for England. Sri Lanka bowled really well at Chelmsford in the 2nd T20; but here England were largely the authors of their own tragedies. Heather Knight played a poor shot; Amy Jones got Amy Jonesed; Freya Kemp only has one way to play, and tonight wasn’t the night for it; and suddenly England’s tail was exposed again.
Sarah Glenn and Dani Gibson got England to a slightly more respectable total than Chelmsford, with a bit of smash ‘n’ grab; but they aren’t the players who we should be looking to to ever do much more than that. Sri Lanka’s bowlers kept pressing, and got their reward – bowling the hosts out with 6 balls left out in the middle.
I guess England’s only hope was to take early wickets and hope Sri Lanka collapsed; so they stuck to Plan A and opened the bowling with Mahika Gaur and Kate Cross. But Plan A didn’t work. Cross’ first over was the most expensive of the match; and Gaur’s second was the second-most costly. By the end of the 4th over of the chase, Sri Lanka needed under 5 an over, and you could probably have started the car at that point.
Chamari was imperious again, and was rightly rewarded with the Player of the Series gong at the end of the game. Sri Lanka remain awfully dependent on her – you do get the feeling that if she’d had gone early, a chase of 117 might have been too much – but she nonetheless left the rest of the lineup with work to do when she holed-out for 44. But what she had done was scored those 44 runs so quickly that the rest could just knock it around for singles and still win easily. And England had no answer to that – they kept an extra fielder in the ring for most of the latter stages, but there were still enough little gaps to be found by the Sri Lankans, who knew they didn’t need to go huge.
Sri Lanka’s patience was their biggest asset after Chamari’s dismissal. Harshitha managed the chase brilliantly, keeping things bubbling-over – they needed under 4 an over, and ticked along at exactly 5 from the 8th over on, to win the game with 18 balls to spare. Again, it wasn’t quite the margin of victory they’d enjoyed at Chelmsford, but it is still a decent win in this form of the game, and it’s not like there were any prizes for Net Run Rate anyway!
England’s bowling wasn’t awful, but it needed to be brilliant if it was going to rescue such a poor batting display, and it wasn’t. The quicks looked toothless, and the spinners didn’t trouble the Sri Lankans too much either, because it is hard to trouble batters who only need to chip it around at less than a run a ball.
A year ago, England scraped a win in the T20 series against India, with more than a little help from the autumnal weather (which the Indians found very uncomfortable) and then went on to lose the ODI series 3-0.
This time around, it is the T20 series which they’ve lost, with still the chance to redeem themselves in the ODIs. England are expected to have Nat Sciver-Brunt back for the ODIs, with Tammy Beaumont coming in as well, to open in place of Wyatt. That will give them a bit more backbone, and hopefully a bit more balance – when every batter is a “see ball/ hit ball” type, when it goes right, it can go very very right, as it did at Hove; but when it goes wrong, it tends to go quite badly wrong, as we’ve seen now at Chelmsford and Derby. These are ODIs which England need to win, with ICC Championship points on the line. Anything less than 3-0 to England and questions will be asked.