MATCH REPORT: Vipers Win Falkland War

Southern Vipers triumphed over South East Stars by 6 wickets to get their Charlotte Edwards Cup title defence off to a flier, in spite of a record-breaking first-wicket partnership of 134 between Bryony Smith (83) and Sophia Dunkley (53).

Vipers made easy work of the 170-run target set for them by Stars, with Charlie Dean (20*) hitting back-to-back boundaries against Phoebe Franklin to take them over the line with 7 balls to spare.

The game was hosted by Falkland Cricket Club in Newbury, making it the first ever professional cricket match to be hosted in the county of Berkshire.

Vipers have always played their home games in either Hampshire (Ageas Bowl) or Sussex (Hove), so it was nice to have a reminder that the regional side also incorporates Berkshire. A crowd of roughly 400, including 150 local schoolchildren, enjoyed the match from the boundary edge; and after Vipers sealed the win, home-grown bowler Lauren Bell was mobbed for autographs.

Vipers won the toss and opted to bowl first, but looked to be ruing their decision after a mammoth, dual onslaught from Smith and Dunkley. Smith looked the most comfortable of the two, enjoying delicious helpings on the leg-side, pulling Georgia Adams for back-to-back sixes over midwicket, and forcing Anya Shrubsole out of the attack in her first competitive game of the season, after her two overs went at 13.5.

Smith was put down on 51* by Linsey Smith, who dropped a skier running in from cover. In the end, only a messy run out in the 15th over, courtesy of a throw-in from Alice Monaghan on the deep midwicket boundary, prevented her from progressing on to a century.

Dunkley fell in the next over, stepping across her stumps to cut but succeeding only in sending a thick edge through to the keeper, allowing Vipers to stifle their opponents in the final few overs. The crowd particularly enjoyed the spectacle of local hero Bell finishing the innings with two wickets in the final over – bowling both Alice Davidson-Richards and Tash Farrant – although they were denied the hat-trick by a whisker, as the ball whistled over the stumps of Kira Chathli.

In reply, Maia Bouchier (30 from 18) got things underway with a glorious drive down the ground for four, as part of a wayward, 18-run opening over from Ryana Macdonald-Gay. Bouchier shared a 50-run opening stand with Danni Wyatt, but was run out in the 5th over after Wyatt called for a second run, chancing the arm of Paige Scholfield in the deep.

Vipers overseas wicketkeeper Nicole Faltum was caught by a diving Dunkley at cover off Freya Davies, while Wyatt herself chipped one up to backward point 10 runs short of a half-century.

But the platform had been laid, and with the target in relatively easy reach, Georgia Adams (29), Georgia Elwiss (28*) and Dean simply had to place the ball well, run hard, and watch the scoreboard tick along.

MATCH REPORT: Blaze Enjoy The Boyce Of Summer At Beckenham

New kids on the block The Blaze continued their unbeaten 2023 season with a 5-wicket win against South East Stars in the opening round of the Charlotte Edwards Cup at Beckenham, thanks to a stolid 63 not out from no.4 Georgie Boyce.

Stars had scored an above-average 160, and when Nat Sciver-Brunt and Tammy Beaumont were dismissed in the 9th and 10th overs – sparking a Blaze collapse of four wickets for 22 runs – it looked like the home side were on course for a win.

Beaumont and Sciver-Brunt had both shown signs of brilliance: Sciver-Brunt’s six off Danielle Gregory thudded into the sight-screen, while Beaumont – perhaps as a signal of intent to the England selectors – chose to open up the innings, and pulled Ryana Macdonald-Gay for a maximum over midwicket in the third over.

But Sciver-Brunt was caught in the deep for 19. Eight balls later, and two runs short of her half-century, Beaumont fell to a brilliant diving catch by Bryony Smith at cover. Sarah Glenn, meanwhile, holed out to Alice Davidson-Richards in the deep for 4.

It was left to Boyce to bring home the bacon, hitting a series of well-placed boundaries and one sweet six smashed over the head of bowler Paige Scholfield, which gradually whittled the target down.

Boyce was dropped at cover in the 17th over, allowing her to bring up a 28-ball fifty. Meanwhile, her partner Nadine de Klerk (16* off 15) survived an edge through the hands of diving wicketkeeper Kira Chathli in the ante-penultimate over, as Stars felt the pressure.

With just two runs needed from the final over, bowled by Davidson-Richards, The Blaze reached their target with four balls to spare.

Earlier, on a blustery day at Beckenham, The Blaze had won the toss and chosen to bowl first. They were at full strength with Beaumont, Glenn and Sciver-Brunt – making her debut for the East Midlands region – all present and correct, while Stars did without Alice Capsey, sitting out as a precaution after a recent foot injury.

Bryony Smith played in customary fashion, smashing 14 runs off the first over from Grace Ballinger, before playing straight into the hands of Marie Kelly at long on in the second.

Tash Farrant, promoted to no.3, was trapped LBW trying to sweep left-armer Ballinger, while Scholfield was caught trying to go over the top, handing Sciver-Brunt her maiden Blaze wicket.

When Sophia Dunkley was bowled playing around a straight one from Glenn in the 7th, the Stars were 48 for 4 and looked in trouble.

But a 68-run partnership for the fifth wicket between Phoebe Franklin (53) and Kira Chathli (24) led the recovery, before a late flourish of 24 off 13 from Davidson-Richards propelled their total to 160 for 8.

It proved enough to make the game exciting, but not quite enough to seal a win.

OPINION: The soccer TV rights row is a significant moment for women’s sport… but not for the reason you think!

The ongoing row between FIFA and the TV companies over the value of broadcast rights for the upcoming Women’s World Cup in Australia and New Zealand this summer (or this winter, if you are actually in Australia or New Zealand) is a watershed moment for women’s sport, and a dangerous one. But the real danger isn’t quite what everyone wants you to think it is.

In a nutshell, FIFA are threatening to withhold the TV rights to the Women’s World Cup from European broadcasters unless they pony-up significantly more cash, insisting that the rights are worth something much closer to what the TV companies pay for the men’s tournament. In a spectacular display of chutzpah, they are invoking equality to make their argument – suggesting that the TV companies are now the ones holding back the growth of women’s sport.

The broadcasters in return argue that they just don’t have any more money.

And the thing is… the broadcasters have a point.

The BBC in particular can’t just pop down to Cash Converters and magic-up more wonga – it can’t sell more ads, or put up subscriptions – its income is based on the license fee, which is currently frozen until 2024, at a time when inflation is running at well over 10%. Every penny it spends on buying the rights to the Women’s World Cup is a penny it can’t spend on other things… like… cricket.

ITV isn’t quite that constrained, but the emphasis is on “quite” – it would have to sell a lot of adverts (at some not-exactly-prime times, given the schedule of a tournament on the other side of the world) to justify paying more. Again, if it does, that’s probably money that is going to come from something else too.

So we’ve reached a crossroads – one where we must face an important question. But what is that question?

If you ask FIFA, the question is: Are the rights to the women’s tournament worth the same as the men’s?

But the real question is this: Are we going to take let FIFA blackmail us into taking yet more money from other sports (like… say… random example… cricket!) and giving it instead to the richest sport on the planet?

In short: Are we going to continue to let football eat everything?

And when you look at it like that, I think we probably know what the right answer is.

So how can we cut through and reach a solution?

We all (well… everyone reading this site, anyway) want more money for women’s sport, and FIFA do have a point that the rights for the men’s and women’s tournaments should be of equal value.

But as someone once said, there is no magic money tree! Increasingly, the only way to find more money for women’s sport is going to be to cut some of our spend on men’s sport.

In this particular case, the broadcasters have wayyyy overpaid for the rights to the (men’s) World Cup – an event that legally has to be shown on free-to-air TV – for far too long, and that needs to change. So the answer is for the BBC to offer FIFA more money for the Women’s World Cup – but only if they accept a corresponding deduction in the value of the men’s rights.

Long term, that is the only sustainable solution for a fair balance not only between men’s and women’s sport, but also between football and every other game on the planet.

NEWS: Blaze Defend Decision To Play At Welbeck

The Blaze have defended their decision to play at Welbeck Cricket Club, after their match against Thunder was abandoned on Monday despite no rain falling all day, due to an unsafe pitch.

CRICKETher understands that the pitch had been used for a men’s club match on Saturday, and that play continued despite falling rain, meaning that the bowler’s run-ups were churned up and unusable by the time Monday’s regional fixture came around.

The umpires were forced to call off the fixture at 2.00pm, meaning that the points on offer were split equally between the two teams.

James Cutt, The Blaze’s Director of Cricket, told CRICKETher:

“While any matchday where we are not able to get onto the field of play is clearly frustrating, this has been a challenging summer nationwide in terms of the sheer amount of wet weather we have suffered – an issue which was only exacerbated by some poor localised weather over the weekend.

“With areas of the ground then failing to improve sufficiently on the day, we recognised, alongside the match officials, that conditions weren’t appropriate for a professional game of cricket, and that the risk to injury remained too high if we were to go ahead and play the game.

“The John Fretwell Centre has a strong recent history of staging professional cricket, with nine Nottinghamshire men’s fixtures staged there over the past eight years, so it’s a setup which is used to the demands of that level of the game.

“We’re really keen to ensure we take The Blaze around the East Midlands this summer, to ensure that this is a team which people across the region can invest their support in, and that we can inspire girls and boys from around the region to pick up a bat and ball.”

The ECB would be within their rights to penalise The Blaze for the incident. The Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy Playing Conditions state that the home team must ensure venues are suitable for play 72 hours prior to the scheduled fixture or arrange an alternative, and that “failure to comply with this… may result in the deduction of points from a Regional Host and the possible award of additional points to another Regional Host”.

Perhaps a greater concern is that this may not be a one-off. The expansion of the regional calendar this season means that a number of regional fixtures are now being played at club grounds. The Blaze are returning to Welbeck twice more this season; while Central Sparks played a “home” fixture against Southern Vipers at Wormsley Cricket Ground on Monday, despite this being within Buckinghamshire (home territory of the Vipers!) Is women’s regional cricket losing out in the battle for pitches to men’s club cricket, and is this acceptable in 2023?

MATCH REPORT: Sparks v Vipers – Adams Adds ‘Em Up at Wormsley

It may have been the 1st of May, but no one had told the weatherman, who served up a morning of April showers at Wormsley as Central Sparks trudged towards a sub-par 183-9. But the sun came out to shine on the Vipers’ pursuit, as they survived a couple of wobbles to chase down their target with 3 wickets and the better part of 9 overs to spare.

Sent in by Vipers captain Georgia Adams, Sparks openers Eve Jones and Chloe Brewer were ready to get the game underway at 10:30 before a violent rain shower sent everyone rushing back to the thatched-roofed Wormsley pavilion as the covers were rushed on, delaying the start of play by twenty minutes.

With the match finally underway at around 10:50, Eve Jones played out a maiden to Lauren Bell’s first over, before Charlie Dean opened at the opposite end – a match-up likely intended for Jones, who Dean has got out twice in regionals. But it was Chloe Brewer who found herself heading back early, caught and bowled by Dean for a two-ball duck.

This brought Abbey Freeborn to the crease, who put on 56 with Jones on her way to a slightly tortuous 43 off 96 balls.

Jones herself was adjudged LBW to Georgia Elwiss for 34 in the 19th over. Replays suggested the decision was arguable, with the ball looking to be going down leg, but with no DRS in regional cricket, Jones had to go; and there was no doubt whatsoever about the dismissal of Davina Perrin two balls later – comprehensively bowled by Elwiss with middle stump pegged-back.

Freeborn continued in partnership with Ami Campbell, who led Sparks’ brightest phase of the game. An over from Elwiss went for 9, and one from Alice Monaghan for 10, putting Sparks 88-3 at the half-way mark, still with a shout of passing 200 if they maintained their pace; but they couldn’t do so, and Freeborn ultimately became the first of Georgia Adams’ 4 victims in the 35th over.

Katie George did her best to liven things up in a brief cameo, which included her and Campbell sending a rare Danni Wyatt over for 15. But even though George’s 23 off 28 represented by far the best strike rate of the Sparks innings, it was still only 82, and once she was dismissed the wheels really started to rattle as Sparks subsided to 183-9, some way short of a par total these days in domestic cricket, albeit in conditions which were not ideal.

Sparks’ only hope was to bowl Vipers out, and they got off to the perfect start – Grace Potts catching McCaughan for 0 off Emily Arlott in the opening over. Having made quick runs at the back end of the Vipers innings on Saturday, Elwiss found herself in very different territory trying to navigate the powerplay with Maia Bouchier. Elwiss defended and defended, never really looking comfortable against the pace of Arlott or Potts, and was next out in the 9th over for 6 off 28 balls, with Vipers 13-2 off the first 9 overs.

A 9-run 10th over made the powerplay look slightly better, but at 22-2 Vipers were still far short of where Sparks had been at the same stage – 30-1.

Danni Wyatt came and went, unable to resist a classic Issy Wong full toss – planting it into the hands of Chloe Brewer – and Bouchier followed shortly afterwards for 25 off 39 balls. At 46-4 Vipers did not look comfortable, and a repeat of their season-opening loss to Sunrisers could definitely have been on the cards.

But a 115 run partnership between Georgia Adams (50) and Charlie Dean (42) turned the tide, taking them to within touching distance of the target at 161. It wasn’t champagne cricket… it wasn’t even prosecco cricket… but it was effective cricket, as Adams and Dean dialled down the risk meter to get the job done.

The dismissals of Adams and Dean in consecutive overs gave the Sparks a bit of hope, but Emily Windsor (10) and Rhianna Southby (8 off 7 – the only innings in the game with a strike rate of 100) carried Vipers home for their second win of the bank holiday weekend.

MATCH REPORT: Vipers Bite Back Against Stars At Beckenham

Southern Vipers bounced back in style after their humiliation at the hands of Sunrisers last week, with an emphatic 158-run win against South East Stars at Beckenham.

On what felt like the first sunny day of the year, Georgia Adams chose to bat first; and Vipers vindicated that decision by putting 287 on the board.

After Maia Bouchier and Ella McCaughan shared a century opening stand, a run-a-ball half-century from Georgia Elwiss at no.4 helped them finish well.

However, Beckenham is renowned for being a decent batting wicket, and the boundary rope was (inexplicably) 10 yards shorter than usual for this game. Stars therefore emerged after the innings break audibly confident about their chances.

Nobody was more confident than Capsey, who looked (as ever) a cut above the rest. She helped Stars to 25 for 0 in the first four overs, and played the shot of the day – a beautiful cover drive.

But the next two overs from Lauren Bell decimated the Stars. Firstly, and most crucially, she bowled Capsey with one which nipped back in to take out her off stump. The next ball, Ryana MacDonald-Gay was adjudged LBW.

Bryony Smith saw off the first hat-trick ball; but then created a chance for a second, as Bell took another two-in-two in her following over. Smith fell to an excellent low catch by Charlie Dean at cover, before Alice Davidson-Richards wafted at one outside off stump and Bouchier snaffled it at slip.

Fresh from scoring her first century in a decade against Thunder last weekend, Paige Scholfield again looked the most assured of the Stars batters, striking the ball cleanly on the way to 31 off 63 balls.

But she was bowled going down on one knee trying to slog Adams in the 27th, and Stars gradually succumbed to their fate – all out for 129 in the 37th over.

Oddly, Stars had earlier chosen not to open the bowling with England’s Freya Davies, instead opting for the combination of Tash Farrant and Phoebe Franklin.

That allowed Bouchier and McCaughan to find their feet and build a platform, which Elwiss and Adams (31) built on with a 76-run partnership for the 4th wicket.

Stars ultimately used a mammoth 9 bowlers, mostly in vain, as Vipers enjoyed a day of regaining their mojo.

NEWS: Raf’s Evidence Published as part of UK Parliamentary Inquiry into Women’s Sport

In December, in response to the success of the Lionesses in the Women’s Euros, the UK Parliament’s Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee set up an inquiry into women’s sport and invited the submission of written evidence.

The terms of reference for the inquiry are:

  1. How can the growth in domestic women’s football be accelerated?
  2. What should other sports be learning from the growth of women’s football leagues in the UK?
  3. What is needed for women’s sporting organisations to grow audiences and revenues?
  4. What action is needed to tackle sexism and misogyny in sport?
  5. What needs to change at a regulatory level to facilitate more parity between men’s and women’s sport?

In my evidence, I focused on Question 5. Those of you who follow The CRICKETher Weekly will be aware that I have quite strong views about how cricket (and other women’s sports) should be governed!

My current research project at Bournemouth University looks at the way in which women’s sporting organisations were forced into “mergers” with men’s sporting organisations in the 1990s – including the Women’s Cricket Association, which (having run women’s cricket since 1926) was absorbed by the newly-formed ECB in 1998.

My research shows that these mergers were not desired by those within women’s sport – they were, largely, government-mandated. The merger “negotiations” were dominated by male voices and priorities, and subsequently (in my view) the mergers stymied the growth and development of women’s sport.

In my evidence, I argue that merged governance (where women’s and men’s sport are run by the same governing bodies) is not always the best way to promote parity between men’s and women’s sport. I also recommend that the Government give serious consideration to the adoption of a model of devolved / separate governance of women’s sport.

That might sound extreme – but it’s important to think hard about why women’s sport hasn’t yet achieved parity with men’s sport. Maybe it’s time to get radical?

A number of National Governing Bodies also submitted evidence to the inquiry, including England Netball, the FA and the RFU. (The ECB didn’t, though – aside from a short joint submission with the FA, LTA, RFU and RFL calling for the Government to improve sport for girls in schools.)

You can read my evidence, as well as all other submissions, here – it’s worth a look!

So, what happens next? Usually, the Committee moves now to oral evidence sessions, so it’s possible I may get a summons to appear before the Committee and present my suggestions there.

After that, an overall report will be compiled with recommendations for the Government, based on all the evidence presented. I’ll keep you updated once that final report is published. The Government don’t have to act on it, of course, but it could make for very interesting reading!

WPL: Bowling Metrics – Do The Ishaque And Vac

It’s always tough to make an impact as a bowler in short-form cricket – you only get 24 balls at most, when the top batters get far more than that. (Imagine if batters had to retire after facing 24 balls?) Furthermore, although there has been a downwards trend in 1st innings totals, WPL has not been a bowlers’ tournament.

But this means that (as someone once said) every ball counts all the more; and the cream rises to the top with the likes of Sophie Ecclestone and Marizanne Kapp showing why they are always amongst the top picks for these franchise tournaments.

A breakthrough player can sometimes still spring a surprise though, and the big one at WPL has been Saika Ishaque (international caps: zero) who tops the ball-by-ball rankings having bowled with metronomic consistency – bagging dot after dot (a dot less than every other ball) while conceding a wide only every 134 balls. Oh… and she took some wickets too – 13 of them, which is unlucky for some – batters, mainly!

TEAM Balls Per… Avg Run Rate
Wicket Dot Single 2/3 4/6 Wide 1st Ins 2nd Ins PP
Mumbai Indians 14 2.20 3.00 30 7 53 7.48 5.56 5.61
Delhi Capitals 22 2.51 2.70 31 6 54 6.70 8.02 6.28
UP Warriorz 22 2.64 2.93 21 5 36 8.16 8.57 7.94
RCB 30 3.12 2.76 29 4 43 9.46 9.62 8.48
Gujarat Giants 22 3.07 2.77 38 4 26 9.23 9.84 9.36
 
PLAYER Balls Per… Avg Run Rate
Wicket Dot Single 2/3 4/6 Wide 1st Ins 2nd Ins PP
S Ishaque 11 1.94 3.19 134 7 134 6.64 4.82 6.30
IECM Wong 19 2.05 3.71 58 7 38 6.60 6.25 6.00
S Ecclestone 12 2.23 2.70 20 8 72 6.27 6.25 5.33
M Kapp 21 1.85 4.23 37 6 37 4.83 7.50 5.71
AC Kerr 12 2.21 2.82 41 6 0 9.20 5.20 0.00
S Pandey 17 2.25 3.21 68 5 45 6.36 7.91 7.33
NR Sciver 17 2.07 3.69 20 7 39 8.44 5.00 4.09
TG Norris 10 2.58 2.58 67 5 67 7.75 8.29 0.00
HK Matthews 12 2.71 2.28 19 10 33 6.25 6.33 6.80
S Asha 21 3.11 2.21 42 5 0 9.10 6.75 0.00
A Capsey 27 2.96 2.05 40 8 40 9.50 5.44 6.75
A Gardner 16 2.90 2.84 36 4 0 9.00 10.33 10.00
KJ Garth 15 2.58 3.19 27 5 19 7.75 8.35 8.33
RS Gayakwad 26 2.49 3.07 19 5 0 7.43 8.75 7.30
JL Jonassen 28 2.90 2.62 17 5 139 8.17 8.73 5.57
DB Sharma 16 3.11 2.38 18 6 29 8.06 8.00 5.00
S Rana 26 2.91 2.42 64 6 26 8.00 8.83 6.75
ML Schutt 44 2.83 2.89 27 4 133 9.67 8.00 7.09
RP Yadav 78 3.00 2.52 16 5 0 6.33 11.75 7.00
SR Patil 20 3.41 2.61 33 3 0 10.00 10.67 12.00
Renuka Singh 101 2.89 3.16 25 4 101 8.89 11.43 7.78
TP Kanwar 36 2.94 2.72 48 5 29 7.67 9.76 10.55
SFM Devine 20 2.46 4.54 20 5 12 8.25 15.00 8.00
Preeti Bose 30 3.75 2.31 0 3 0 10.50 10.00 13.20
K Anjali Sarvani 50 3.00 3.09 20 6 11 9.42 6.00 8.70
EA Perry 47 2.92 3.04 20 6 14 8.57 9.14 6.80
HC Knight 11 6.14 2.26 22 4 43 11.67 13.00 0.00
A Sutherland 31 3.72 2.82 93 3 23 10.71 14.00 7.50
M Joshi 26 3.47 3.06 17 4 13 8.50 11.83 10.67
©CRICKETher.com/cricsheet.org

WPL: Batting Metrics – The Real Value Of Jemimah Rodrigues

These rankings offer a little bit of a shift in perspective to those you’ll see elsewhere, because they completely ignore the total number of runs scored (or wickets taken) and look purely at ball-by-ball performance. They aren’t better or worse than the absolute rankings, but they are different… and we like different!

The epitome of this is Jemimah Rodrigues, who has looked poor value in terms of her absolute numbers. She was one of the most expensive players in the competition, costing Delhi Capitals 2.2 Cr – twice as much as Meg Lanning – but while Meg Lanning was the top run-scorer in the group stages with 310 runs, Jemimah was well down the pack, at 22nd with 117 runs.

And it is true that Jemimah has not been in the best of form – she’ll be disappointed with 117 runs and a highest score of 34*.

But what the metrics show is that even when she is out of form, she maintains her ball-by-ball numbers like (almost) no one else. She might not be finding the boundary, but she is getting off strike, taking a single every 1.8 balls (by far the lowest number of balls per single in WPL) and running like the clappers to also take a 2 or 3 every 15 balls. And this is what you want in short-form franchise cricket – no one is going to be in form every tournament, so what you need is players who will adapt to their lack of form, and not waste deliveries trying to bat themselves back into form at the team’s expense.

(It is even more important in The Hundred, with its ultra-short format, which is why it is a pity Jemimah priced herself out of the market by setting her reserve price to the top salary band. But to be fair, if I’d just made ÂŁ220,000 in the WPL,  I probably wouldn’t think ÂŁ25,000 was worth getting out of bed for either, so no shade on her for that!)

Compare and contrast with Ash Gardner – another of the highest-paid players – who after a brilliant T20 World Cup also struggled for form at WPL, but who seemed to let that get to her and didn’t really deliver in either absolute (10th) or ball-by-ball (15th) numbers.

Unsurprisingly, the highest-ranked English player in the ball-by-ball metrics is Alice Capsey. Capsey is the personification of the ball-by-ball approach to cricket, and as such I suspect we’ll look back on her debut in The Hundred as a watershed moment in the history of the women’s game. She came in, aged 16, and showed that you could go at a strike rate of 100 from ball one, and it changed people’s expectations. She’s yet to make a really big score, but she will… and does it really matter anyway if she’s hitting at 13.5 runs per over when she’s in the middle?

TEAM Balls Per… Avg Run Rate
Wicket Dot Single 2/3 4/6 1st Ins 2nd Ins PP
Delhi Capitals 21 3.04 2.67 25 5 9.29 8.82 9.39
Mumbai Indians 24 2.69 3.03 31 4 8.27 9.39 7.42
RCB 18 2.68 2.83 35 5 7.64 9.29 8.64
UP Warriorz 21 2.68 2.84 27 5 7.54 8.50 6.31
Gujarat Giants 17 2.45 2.79 27 6 8.10 4.89 6.38
 
PLAYER Balls Per… Avg Run Rate
Wicket Dot Single 2/3 4/6 1st Ins 2nd Ins PP
Shafali Verma 21 3.06 3.96 21 3 11.30 14.50 11.36
JI Rodrigues 23 5.00 1.80 15 7 9.22 7.00 0.00
JL Jonassen 24 3.43 2.53 16 4 15.00 8.25 0.00
SFM Devine 22 3.08 3.08 31 3 8.11 12.50 10.93
SR Patil 21 2.93 3.42 21 4 9.20 16.00 0.00
TM McGrath 30 2.98 3.13 30 4 9.33 10.92 9.00
H Kaur 32 3.37 2.98 64 3 11.31 11.33 0.00
M Kapp 49 3.03 2.26 49 6 11.60 7.40 0.00
MM Lanning 37 2.95 2.90 26 5 9.14 8.00 8.69
AJ Healy 26 3.07 2.87 33 4 7.75 11.00 8.85
A Capsey 17 2.48 4.00 52 3 13.50 12.80 10.00
S Ecclestone 42 2.47 2.80 11 7 6.50 9.50 0.00
D Hemalatha 16 2.95 2.71 33 5 12.20 9.00 9.00
NR Sciver 46 2.60 3.37 35 4 7.44 10.08 7.80
A Gardner 18 3.12 2.41 27 5 9.40 8.00 0.00
EA Perry 28 3.04 2.30 43 5 8.31 8.64 8.17
SIR Dunkley 11 2.28 7.13 14 3 11.00 0.00 11.00
HC Knight 21 3.04 2.58 43 4 6.50 10.36 9.00
HK Matthews 30 2.32 3.21 38 5 8.40 8.64 8.08
KS Ahuja 13 2.42 3.94 21 4 10.67 9.50 0.00
RM Ghosh 23 2.39 2.94 46 6 9.71 6.86 0.00
H Deol 27 2.84 2.56 27 5 8.67 5.50 6.11
Simran Shaikh 11 2.44 2.00 22 22 5.50 0.00 0.00
S Rana 9 2.43 2.43 17 9 6.50 7.00 0.00
S Mandhana 16 2.07 3.86 28 5 5.83 9.00 8.00
YH Bhatia 24 2.18 3.55 47 5 5.40 9.33 7.24
KP Navgire 21 2.02 3.75 26 7 7.00 7.30 6.18
DP Vaidya 15 2.92 2.24 38 10 6.00 6.55 6.00
DB Sharma 19 2.45 2.30 38 11 7.50 5.13 0.50
S Verma 23 2.42 2.30 46 15 5.75 6.00 2.00
S Meghana 14 1.95 4.00 42 6 6.40 7.00 6.00
A Sutherland 9 1.64 4.50 12 12 7.33 2.00 3.00
S Sehrawat 7 1.75 3.50 0 11 8.00 3.50 3.50
©CRICKETher.com/cricsheet.org

T20 WORLD CUP FINAL – Australia v South Africa: Gardnering Leave

A tightly disciplined powerplay bowling performance set Australia up to lift the World Cup at Newlands, as they went on to defend a par total and win by 19 runs.

Australia held South Africa to 22-1 in the powerplay, with Ash Gardner conceding just 2 runs from her one of those overs, on her way to final figures of 1-20. She epitomised the professionalism of Australia’s approach with the ball in this game, bowling to a clear plan to cramp Tazmin Brits and Laura Wolvaardt for room, which strangled South Africa’s batters early-doors and left them too much to do in the final overs.

Earlier, Australia had posted 156-6 – a par total, which lacked the swagger of their performance at the MCG in the 2020 final, when they had put 184 past helpless India. Beth Mooney was once again the lynchpin of the innings, but without the fireworks Alyssa Healy had provided at the other end in 2020, they couldn’t quite find the rhythm that marks out an exceptional batting performance. Healy and Meg Lanning faced 31 balls between them – lest we forget, over a quarter of the innings – and scored 28 runs at a strike rate of 90 – not exactly “Jon-Ball” territory.

The 29 off 21 which Gardner contributed looked like a cameo at the time, but turned out to be pretty crucial in the end – 10 runs fewer, and it could all have been a different story.

Laura Wolvaardt remains an enigma in T20 cricket. She showed in The Hundred that she can play a single-handed match-winning innings; and there were echoes of the time she smashed 90 off 49 balls for the Superchargers to beat the Originals last summer when she struck the 13th and 14th overs for 14 and 15 runs respectively. Just for a moment, there was hope that she might be able to defy the odds the way she did that day in Leeds.

But it wasn’t to be. 10 runs came of the 15th, but Ash Gardner bowled a tight 6 for 6 in the 16th, which ratcheted-up the pressure and forced the mistake from Wolvie in the following over – Megan Schutt getting the notch, as the South African missed a slog-sweep and was plumb LBW.

You could probably have called the game in that moment, and certainly when Chloe Tryon was bowled by Jess Jonassen in the following over, it was time to pay-out on Australia.

South Africa have done themselves proud in this tournament, as a nearly-13,000 crowd acknowledged at the end, applauding the team who scrapped to get to the final after everyone had written them off, and took Australia – probably the best team ever to have played the game – the distance here.

As for Australia… what can I say that’s not been said before? Since the disappointment of 2017, they’ve won everything there has been to win, weathering key retirements, as the likes of Alex Blackwell and Rachael Haynes stepped aside and players like Tahlia McGrath (look at the record over the past year, not the shocker today!) and Ash Gardner in particular stood up. They’ve built a juggernaut, which ran over England in 2018, India in 2020, England again in 2022, and now South Africa in 2023. Someone, someday will stop their momentum… but that day was not today.