A few English clubs seem to have been contacted overnight by email regarding a “Women’s Premier League” in India:

“We are proud to announce that Knights Sports and Events Private Limited is organizing India’s 1st T20 Cricket League exclusively for Women by the name of Women’s Premier League.”

The email concludes:

“We would like to take this opportunity to extend an invitation to your club to participate in this tournament. As mentioned, this is a by invitation tournament and all expenses once your team arrives in India shall be taken care off ranging from Playing Kits, Hotel, Food, and Transport.”

Having spoken to contacts in India, we are fairly confident that this is at best totally unofficial and at worst a scam.

(We will updated this post if any other evidence emerges to the contrary!)

In Division 2 of the Women’s County Championship, with 2 teams to be promoted to Div 1, and 2 to be relegated to Div 3, there is everything to play for going into the final weekend of fixtures.

Only one team already know where they will play next year – everyone else is in the mix for promotion or relegation, and indeed one side could still be either promoted or relegated!

[1] Worst = The lowest points total possible for this team.
[2] Best = The highest points total possible.

At the bottom of the table, Essex are the one county who already know their fate – the best they can finish on is 6.4, and the worst Worcestershire can get is 7.5, so Essex are relegated whatever.

The key relegation scrap then is between Worcestershire and Leicestershire – they are closer than they look, because Leicestershire have had 2 abandonments to Worcestershire’s one, meaning on average each point is worth more to Leicestershire at this stage, so it might well come down to bonus points between them.

In the promotion battle, Lancashire, Nottinghamshire and Wales all have their fate in their own hands. Lancashire and Wales play each other, but it isn’t quite as simple as “winner takes it all” – Wales need to get a bag of bonus points on the board, or they will still be relying on others to slip up.

Meanwhile, Hampshire need to get a win with near-maximum bonus points and hope others don’t; but Hampshire’s advantage is that they play Essex – the only side in the division without a win this season.

The most interesting case is Devon – they could be relegated if they lose badly to Leicestershire, and Worcestershire also get a big win… but they could also theoretically be promoted if lots of other results fall in their favour.

UPDATE: For Devon to be promoted requires them to get 18 at least 17 points, both Lancashire and Nottinghamshire to lose with zero bonus points and Hampshire to lose with 4 or fewer bonus points. (Lancs and Notts both getting zero bonus points is the unlikely bit – they only need to get 75 runs or take 3 wickets for a BP!)

This is the somewhat complicated situation as we think it stands for the bottom 4 – Middlesex, Surrey, Staffs and Somerset – 3 of whom go down.

(NB Berkshire have already accrued enough bonus points that they are definitely safe, even if they take no points at all from their final match with Kent.)

Middlesex have to play Staffs, and will stay up if they win, or even if they lose providing they get 5 bonus points.

Surrey are already down because they can no longer overtake Middlesex under any circumstances – even if they win their remaining match (v Sussex) with maximum bonus points, they will finish on just 8.0 points, but the least Middlesex can finish on is 8.3 points.

Staffs have their destiny (mostly – see below) in their own hands – if they beat Middlesex with full bonus points and keep Middlesex to a maximum of 4 bonus points, they will have 9 points, and therefore overtake Middlesex, who would have c. 8.3-8.9 points, depending on exactly how many bonus points they actually got.

Somerset meanwhile first need Staffs to beat Middlesex, but without Staffs getting the maximum bonus points and with Middlesex getting 4 or fewer bonus points, leaving both Middlesex and Staffs on 8-point-something points. If Somerset then beat Warwickshire with full bonus points, they will have the 9 points they need to overtake both Middlesex and Staffs to survive.

There is also one other potentially interesting scenario – if both Staffs and Somerset end up with 9 points, we go to the match between them… which was abandoned… so it then goes to Net Run Rate, which is currently in Staff’s favour, by 0.77 r/o!

Got that? (Good… ‘cos we’re not sure we have!!)

Although the table on Play Cricket is definitely wrong at the time of writing (the bonus points aren’t right) it looks like results yesterday mean that Kent have won the Women’s County Championship for the 7th time.

(Update: The correct table is here on Cricket Archive, which confirms that our numbers below are right.)

Kent had the day off yesterday, but both their closest challengers lost – Sussex to Berkshire and Warwickshire to Middlesex – meaning Kent’s lead is now unassailable.

This means a One Day and T20 “double” for Kent, and a unique “triple” for Charlotte Edwards, Suzie Bates, Lydia Greenway and Tash Farrant, who also won the Kia Super League with the Southern Vipers.

So it will be “trebles all round” and another trip to Buckingham Palace for Edwards and co… though it will be interesting to see if it is with the Vipers or with Kent, now that the County Champs is probably no longer considered the “premier” women’s domestic competition.

Mathsy stuff follows…

(We have double checked it, and we think it is correct!!)

Kent currently have 116 points from 7 completed games, with one to play, meaning the worst average they can finish with is 14.5 ^[1].

Warwickshire have 62* points from 5 games with one to play, so the best they can finish with is 13.3 ^[2].

Sussex have 63* points from 5 games with two to play, meaning the best they can end up with is 14.1 ^[3].

—————-

* Including the bonus points which we think are missing on Play Cricket! (Update: Cricket Archive agrees with us.)

[1] 116 + 0 = 116 / 8 = 14.5

[2] 62 + 18 = 80 / 6 = 13.3

[3] 63 + 18 + 18 = 99 / 7 = 14.1

Berkshire’s Carla Rudd starred with the bat as the Beavers beat Sussex by 34 runs at North Maidenhead to ensure their survival in Division 1.

Having elected to bowl first – a decision which looked sensible to the visiting eye, but apparently left the locals raising their eyebrows – Sussex were set a total of 277 to chase, and made a strong start, as Georgias Adams (75) and Elwiss (37) and Izzy Collis (34) played positive cricket at the top of the innings, using the powerplay as a launchpad to set the visitors on course at 133-1 off the first 20 overs.

Berkshire needed some luck, and they arguably got it when Collis was inexplicably given out stumped off Linsey Smith, despite being apparently clearly back in her ground.

Smith then went on to take the wickets of Adams (caught by Fi Morris) and Danni Wyatt (caught by Heather Knight for 12) in a crucial spell which tipped the game back in Berkshire’s favour. An unbeaten 43 from Abi Freeborn proved in vain as Berkshire’s attack shared-around the 9 wickets they needed for maximum bonus points, leaving Sussex 34 short at the close, on 243-9.

But it was earlier in the day that the game had really been won, as Berkshire posted 277-6 from their 50 overs. Rachel Priest (52), Sherissa Gumbs (43) and Heather Knight (50) all contributed, but it was a marvellous 79 off 71 balls from Carla Rudd, coming in at 4 to make her highest score in senior cricket, which was the difference between the teams.

Rudd, who had shown promise as a junior but never quite “made it” as a batsman in senior cricket until today, grew in confidence as her innings progressed, finding the boundary with everything from powerful pulls through midwicket, to dinky scoops over the head of the keeper, before eventually falling to the arm of Danni Wyatt, who ran her out with a direct hit from the edge of the circle at cover.

Afterwards we spoke to Rudd, who told us how important the victory was for Berkshire:

“It was a needed win, to make sure we stay up in the 50-Over County Championship, and it was nice to get it today, so we don’t have to rely on the Kent game next week.”

Rudd partly credits her new-found form to working with former England Test batsman Jason Gallian, who is a fellow coach at Felstead School:

“I’ve spent a lot of time with Jason this winter, doing one-to-one stuff, and I feel like I’ve got a different batting mindset and a few more shots that I can use out on the wicket, so it was nice for me to finally spend a bit of time out there and get some runs on the board.”

“There was a lot of turn out there, especially later on, but once you got in the ball was coming on to the bat quite nicely, and if it was short it was sitting up and ‘holding’ so it was nice, especially playing square of the wicket.”

Going into the final two rounds of the County Championship, 5 sides are in danger of relegation from Division 1: Berkshire, Middlesex and Somerset with 2 wins apiece; Surrey with 1; and Staffs, who have yet to win a game. (Remember – 3 sides are relegated this season!)

Berkshire are in the driving seat, as they have racked-up more bonus points than the other threatened teams; but they also have the toughest run-in – they play Sussex today and Kent on the final day. A win on either day would see them safe; but if not it will come down other results, in which case Staffs could do them a favour by beating Surrey today.

Middlesex play Warwickshire today and Staffs on the final day. Like Berkshire, they need to win one of these games, but they will feel confident about beating Staffs on the final day, so they should be safe.

Somerset have Yorkshire and Warwickshire. Broken record alert… they too need to win at least one of these games – but they are already dependent on other results – if Middlesex beat Warwickshire today, they likely need to win both their remaining matches.

Surrey have Staffs, plus a re-arranged game against Sussex. They need to win both matches, or they will almost certainly go down.

Staffs have Surrey and Middlesex. Although they are currently winless with just 9 points (to Berkshire’s 53), the average points system means they can theoretically survive if they win both their remaining games and if everyone else in the relegation zone loses all theirs – unlikely, but stranger things have happened!

The dust may have barely settled over “Battlefield Chelmsford”, but over at Lords thoughts are quickly turning to KSL 2.0, which has already been penciled-into the calendar, with the same six teams contesting a One Day competition in the weeks leading up to the World Cup, and the Twenty20s in a block afterwards.

Whilst the broad picture is clear, there are a lot of details still to be confirmed, as the ECB embark upon a “comprehensive review” of this year’s competition, taking feedback from everyone involved – including the fans, who can have their say by filling out the survey here!

Rumours abound that one thing we may see next year is a “reshuffle” of the teams, and CRICKETher can confirm that not only is this under consideration, but the ECB are also not currently ruling out the possibility of key players competing in different colours in the One Day and T20 competitions.

The desire to keep the competition balanced is a laudable one, certainly from the perspective of the ECB’s goal of “bridging the gap”; but one area where the KSL has been successful well beyond expectations is in building fanbases – plural!

Prior to the competition, we were asked what “success” might look like in terms of match attendances – we mused that an average “gate” of 500 would be pretty good, given that the number of spectators at a typical county match can often be counted on the fingers of one hand.

That the KSL has far exceeded that, is as much as anything down to the hard yards the players put in – visiting clubs, holding coaching sessions, and working the local media. Loyalties were created; but they are still fragile, and they could be torn apart in a moment – and the easiest way of doing that would be to “rob” a young fan of her favourite player; or (worse still) to give her a new favourite player in the One Day competition… and then snatch her away again in the T20s.

Not to mention that the players generally don’t want to move either – they’ve nailed their colours to their masts, as Charlotte Edwards made pretty clear to us in our interview:

“Don’t try and move any of us… everyone is firmly in allegiance with their team!”

Over the longer term, of course, it might have to happen, but moving key players should be a last resort – not least because right now it isn’t even clear that the KSL is “unbalanced” – no team lost all their games, and no team won them all either. Even Lancashire Thunder, who perhaps looked most in need of “bolstering”, having lost their key England player – Sarah Taylor – could so easily have been a very different story, if Danni Wyatt (average 8) and Hayley Matthews (4) had lived up to expectations with the bat.

Building a brand new competition from scratch is a massive challenge – you aren’t going to get everything right, but in the case of KSL the ECB have gotten pretty damn close. Now, like a fine wine, it just needs time to mature… and that won’t happen if you spend too much time opening up the barrell and mixing stuff around!

For our Team of the Tournament we’ve stuck to the same rules as the KSL itself: 3 overseas and 3 England, with the remainder selected from amongst the county and Academy players.

We’ve tried to pick players in their natural batting position – meaning (unluckily) no spot for Lancashire Thunder opener Emma Lamb – and to include a balanced bowling attack of seamers and spinners.

1. Stafanie Taylor (WS / O)
2. Suzie Bates * (SV / O)
3. Heather Knight (WS / E)
4. Nat Sciver (SS /E)
5. Arran Brindle (SV)
6. Ellyse Perry (LL / O)
7. Katherine Brunt (YD /E)
8. Carla Rudd + (SV)
9. Freya Davies (WS)
10. Alex Hartley (SS)
11. Linsey Smith (SV)

O = Overseas; E = England

The top of the batting order pretty-much picks itself – Stafanie Taylor and our captain, Suzie Bates, were the outstanding players of the tournament; whilst Heather Knight and Nat Sciver were the best performing England players in our batting rankings.

For the all-rounders, we’ve gone for Arran Brindle who had a great tournament with the ball and contributed some quick runs coming in late with the bat; Ellyse Perry, who started poorly, but whose class came-good over the competition as a whole; and Katherine Brunt, who showed she really is an all-rounder at this level, contributing vital runs as well as her usual wickets for the Diamonds.

Carla Rudd is our glove-butler, having had a very tidy tournament behind the stumps for the Southern Vipers, also contributing 4 dismissals – all stumpings.

Finally for our bowlers, we’ve selected a seamer – Freya Davies, who took 5 wickets at a very respectable economy rate of 7.4 for an opening bowler; and two spinners – Alex Hartley and Linsey Smith, whose 4-10 for the Vipers versus the Diamonds were the best figures for a spinner in the tournament.