Each of the 8 WBBL teams will be able to select a maximum of 3 overseas stars.
We’ve chosen 24 of the world’s top “overseas” players below… so which 3 would you pick for your WBBL team?
Each of the 8 WBBL teams will be able to select a maximum of 3 overseas stars.
We’ve chosen 24 of the world’s top “overseas” players below… so which 3 would you pick for your WBBL team?
Australia’s Women’s Big Bash League, which will take place next December-through-January, will cap teams to a maximum of 5 “star” players.
Domestic cricket in Australia has suffered slightly as a spectacle over the years, because so many top players have gravitated towards the New South Wales Breakers, who have won the WNCL 10 seasons in a row and 16 times overall.
Although WNCL is set to continue as a 50-over competition, the key focus will now be on the T20 WBBL, which will feature a much more level playing field.
Teams will be limited to a maximum of 5 “stars” – i.e. current or recent internationals – of which 3 may be overseas players.
This means up to 24 overseas internationals will get to join the party, with England glove-butler Sarah Taylor, West Indies’ big hitting batsman Deandra Dottin, and South African leg-spinning all-rounder Dane van Niekerk, likely to be at the top of many of those wish-lists.
A 2-1 series* victory over Sri Lanka has moved the West Indies up to 3rd in the Women’s International Championship, pushing England down to 5th, though England have 3 games in hand, to be played against Australia as part of this summer’s Women’s Ashes.
Australia remain top of the WIC, despite having played 3 matches fewer than 2nd-placed South Africa.
The top 4 sides qualify automatically for the World Cup in England in 2017.
| Team | Played | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 12 |
| South Africa | 9 | 11 |
| West Indies | 9 | 10 |
| Pakistan | 9 | 8 |
| England | 6 | 7 |
| Sri Lanka | 9 | 5 |
| New Zealand | 6 | 4 |
| India | 6 | 3 |
————-
* Although the full WI/SL “series” is 5 games, of which 4 are complete at time of writing, only games 2-4 count for the WIC.
About two overs from the end of the Pemberton Greenish Cup, the scoreboards at The Oval died. It summed up a dispiriting evening for Surrey on the pitch; but off the field it was a day that was anything but disappointing.
Over 700 children from local schools packed out the pavilion for yesterday’s match. Kids from all walks of life were equally excited to be there – boys from state primaries cheered the big hits; and girls from posh, private preps applauded the clattering of stumps; all accompanied by a noisy DJ, who might have made the traditionalists frown, but who brought a sense of bounce to the occasion that held up the excitement levels even as the game drifted slightly towards the end.
Earlier in the day, a rammed indoor school had seen 300 children through bowling clinics and batting master-classes from Surrey coaching staff, with guest appearances from the captains, Cecily Scutt and Izzy Westbury.
One teacher at an all-girls school told us of the challenges she faces introducing cricket to the curriculum: “All the schools around us play rounders in the summer, so it’s hard to get a game; but I’m hoping that if one leads, the others will follow.”
After the match a champagne-soaked Izzy Westbury was full of praise for the leadership of Ebony Rainford-Brent, telling CRICKETher: “It’s an amazing thing to be playing a domestic cricket match with this turn-out and a lot of counties could learn a lot from it.”
Will there be better games of cricket played in this year’s Women’s County Championship? No doubt! Will there be a bigger “event” in the domestic game this season? No… and that’s why this day was important!
Plans for a Women’s Big Bash in Australia over the (Antipodean) summer of 2015/16 look to have descended into a bitter three-way pile-on between Cricket Australia, the ACA (the players’ union) and the teams themselves over (what else?) money!
Cricket Australia’s plan that the new league should mirror the 8-team men’s competition always looked ambitious; but it turns out that they were not expecting to have to pay for it – the assumption apparently being that players’ payments would come out of the existing (men’s) salary budgets.
This plan however was pole-axed by the ACA, who called it “robbing Peter to pay Pauline” – adamant that the men’s (much larger) salaries would not be reduced one iota to pay the women’s (considerably smaller) retainers.
The teams then in effect replied “don’t look at us” – despite an earlier insistence that they should call the tunes by selecting and contracting players themselves, the idea of actually paying the piper was apparently not quite what they had in mind!
So it has been left to Cricket Australia to pick up the budget to the tune of some half a million Australian dollars, part of which will come from reducing payments to the Southern Stars. Cricket Australia argue that the players will end up with the same amount of money at the end of the day; but a less charitable interpretation might be that they are now robbing Pauline to pay Pauline.
Meanwhile, the ACA is now also haggling after a “Memorandum of Understanding” over women players’ salaries – effectively a long-term collective-bargaining agreement, which is arguably in principle a good thing; but has further damaged relations with Cricket Australia, who argue that huge steps have already been made. With retainers going from $15,000 just a couple of years ago to over $50,000 now, Cricket Australia believe that anything more is unrealistic in the short term.
It is all an uncomfortable reminder that even in those countries such as England and Australia, where women’s cricket exists on a relatively stable financial footing compared to places like New Zealand and India, we remain indentured to The Other Game and when something has to give… well… I think we are all acutely aware of where it might (and might not) give first!
The somewhat one-sided war of words between Kent and Sussex over their controversially tied Women’s County Championship match took another sour turn this week as Kent CEO Jamie Clifford waded in to the argument.
Seemingly taking the ECB to task over their decision to uphold the result, Clifford said in a statement:
“We [Kent] do not believe that there has been an appropriate review and a number of questions remain unanswered.”
Ironically, the main question nobody at Kent seems to want to answer* is what exactly they were complaining about in the first place – there being no basis, in either the Laws of the game or the Playing Conditions of the competition, for the result to be ever in dispute, let alone a week after a private ECB meeting concluded that there was no reason to overturn the original decision.
Last week Kent Coach Stuart Eddicott took to Twitter to call the ECB’s decision “shameful”. The fact that his tweet remains undeleted might seem to represent at least a tacit endorsement of this position by the Kent hierarchy, who could presumably have required him to remove it.
It is unclear at this stage whether the ECB have reopened their investigation into the incident in response to Kent’s queries.
———-
* We did ask!
The continuing amateur status of women’s cricket in New Zealand was underlined today when it was announced that two leading players will be stuck at home, while the White Ferns face critical World Cup qualification matches in India.
Batsman Sara McGlashan and spinner Erin Bermingham, who both played in the recent series against England, are unavailable for the upcoming India tour due to work commitments.
They will be missed though, as New Zealand face India in 3 “must-win” Women’s International Championship games, which help determine automatic qualification for the 2017 World Cup in England, plus 3 T20s and another 2 ODIs.
Although New Zeland Women do have central contracts, these might be better termed “retainers” as the money barely covers expenses, and the players all need their day jobs to make ends meet.
Full Squad:
Kent players and coaching staff have taken to Twitter to express their anger at the ECB’s decision not to overturn the result of their disputed tie with Sussex.
A tweet from the Kent coach brands the ECB’s judgement “shameful”; saying that the spirit of cricket has taken a “U-Turn”; and also appears to question the honesty and integrity of the Sussex players and officials who responded to the ECB inquiry.
The tweet was then Favorited by two leading Kent players. (A “Favorite“, like a Facebook “Like“, allows a Twitter user to express agreement or sympathy with the opinion expressed in the original post.)
Although the accounts involved are not official “Kent CCC” accounts, they are not private either; and one is a publicly verified “Blue Tick” account, due to the the individual’s status as a contracted England player.
NOTE – The screenshots above were taken at 06:00 on May 8th 2015.
UPDATE – The two players who Favorited the tweet have since Un-Favorited it.
The ECB have released a statement this evening upholding the umpire’s on-field decision that the controversial Kent / Sussex game last weekend ended in a tie.
Kent had appealed the result to the ECB, as they believed the ball to have been dead in the hands of their wicket-keeper when Sussex snatched a last-ball single to tie the game.
But after some consultation and discussion on the field, the umpires adjudicated that the run was fairly scored; and this decision has now been firmly upheld by the ECB.
The ECB’s full statement appears below:
“The ECB has been in communication with the umpires, and the Kent and Sussex management teams regarding events at the conclusion of the Royal London Women’s One-Day Championship match between the two sides on Monday 4th May 2015.
Following receipt of all information and discussions with the Head of ECB Association of Cricket Officials, it has been decided that there is no reason to overturn any decision made by the umpires on the day, nor the outcome of the game as had been determined on the day. The match is therefore a tie.”
The ECB have confirmed to CRICKETher that an appeal has been received from Kent regarding the controversial conclusion to their match with Sussex on Monday, which was initially declared by the umpires to have ended in a tie.
Statements have been presented from various interested parties, including the umpires, and currently, the ECB consider that the match has no official “result”.
The full ECB statement appears below:
The ECB is currently in communication with the umpires, and the Kent and Sussex management teams as to the outcome of the Royal London Women’s One-Day Cup match between the two sides on Monday 4 May 2015.
The incident came to the ECB’s attention immediately following the conclusion of the match.
All of the information is being carefully considered as a matter of priority.
We’ll keep you posted with more information as we have it.