Six wickets and a cool, calm 38 not out from Kate Cross was enough for England to secure victory against Ireland in the 1st ODI at Stormont in Belfast.

#IREvENG Ireland 210 v England 211-6

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-09-07T15:36:06.733Z

On what locals told us was the finest day of the summer in Northern Ireland, the Irish (whose team comprises members from both Northern Ireland (part of the UK) and the Republic of Ireland) opted to bat first having won the toss, and would probably have settled for anything over 200, which is where the threshold of respectability lies in ICC Championship cricket right now – a “typical” 1st innings score being between 200 and 300, with 250 the average in recent years.

#IREvENG Ireland 210 v England

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-09-07T12:55:28.928Z

England got the early breakthrough, with Kate Cross going up twice for LBW to Una Raymond-Hoey in the opening over, and getting the decision at the second time of asking; and Ireland also lost Gaby Lewis in the powerplay – dismissed by the perfect Lauren Filer delivery, bouncing into the rib-cage of Lewis, who could couldn’t get her glove out of the way in time, sending a catch lolliping up to Hollie Armitage at slip.

This brought local girl Amy Hunter (born in Belfast) and Orla Prendergast (last seen playing for The Blaze in regionals) together, who put on 53 to steady the ship as England struggled to drive home any advantage those early wickets might have given them. That’s not to say that Hunter and Prendergast quite got away from England, but both were able to milk relatively easy runs from Hannah Baker and Ryana MacDonald-Gay, and if it hadn’t been for a lapse in concentration from Hunter right after the drinks break at 16 overs, the two might have done a lot more damage.

Prendergast showed her worth to this Ireland team, continuing to push on with Leah Paul, including hitting the only 6 of the innings, before eventually holing-out off Kate Cross in the 31st over for a well-made 76 off 87 balls. It was a rapid ride downhill for Ireland from there, as they slipped from 151-3 to 210 all out as Kate Cross completed her 6fer, meaning ultimately that they left the field disappointed, with a total they would probably have taken at the start of the day.

With 5 debutantes in their lineup, including 3 making their first appearances for England – Baker, MacDonald-Gay and Paige Scholfield – there was definitely potential for England to collapse in a bundle of nerves, especially if they lost a couple of early wickets. With Emma Lamb having departed early, England could have done with Tammy Beaumont sticking around but she got an unplayable delivery from Prendergast – very likely the Ball of the Series, it nipped in at pace between bat and pad to take the very top off the off bail – a delivery that would have dismissed Meg Lanning in her prime.

It was left to two of those debutantes – Scholfield and Hollie Armitage – to get England back on track, under a fair bit of pressure with  only 32 on the board, but whilst both might be debutantes, neither are dilettantes, and at 28 and 27 respectively both have years of professional cricket behind them. That experience showed, as they worked the field in a 62 run partnership that tested the captaincy of Gaby Lewis, who found herself chasing the gaps – plugging one, only for Scholfield and Armitage to find another.

Neither Scholfield (31) nor Armitage (44) were able to push on quite as far as they no doubt would have liked, but their partnership of 62 ensured that England had the platform they needed to go on and win the game.

England definitely had the edge at the half-way point in their innings, but it wasn’t a done deal, with WinHer giving Ireland still a 24% chance at that stage.

#IREvENG Ireland 210 v England 146-5

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-09-07T14:57:37.846Z

It took the most experienced player in the side – the captain Kate Cross, selected for this role very much because England wanted someone who could be a calm head in a crisis, to come in at 8 and get England over the line. If Hollie Armo was Bob The Builder, and Scholfield, Freya Kamp and Bess Heath were Scoop, Muck and Dizzy; then Cross was Wendy – turning up in the final act to do what needed to be done and finish the job!

Cross was understandably delighted at the end, basking in the glow of a Player of the Match award in her first game as captain (something which Heather Knight also achieved, back in 2016 against Pakistan), but Ireland will retain some hope that they can take something from this series against an England team that were definitely a step below the usual 1st XI. Ireland have some decent players in the likes of Prendergast and Hunter, who look capable of winning a match on their day; but it will definitely take “their day”, with Ireland’s fielding in particular looking amateurish compared to England’s, leaking runs they could ill-afford to as England closed in on their total. If Ireland can keep heart, it looks set to be an interesting next 10 days on the Emerald Isle.

By Andy Frombolton

Let’s start by looking at some data from The Hundred and the Charlotte Edwards Cup.

First, The Hundred …

All-rounders: 100+ runs plus 5+ wickets or wicket-keepers scoring 100+ runs. A ‘low-impact’ player took <5 wickets (i.e. wasn’t primarily a bowler) and scored <50 runs (i.e. did not contribute significantly with the bat.

Sticking with the same team is obviously fine if you’re winning, but 3 teams (Originals, Superchargers and Phoenix) won only 3 games and SB won just 1. It’s thus extremely telling about the deemed quality of the possible replacements that the coaches stuck with so many under-performing players in these circumstances.

The Hundred is promoted as the premier short-form competition and one might expect international players to dominate the batting and bowling tables. As this article will show, this was certainly true of the women’s competition, but far less so in the men’s Hundred (16 of the top 20 run scorers were English, 6 of whom were ‘uncapped’ [at international level] and 11 of the top 20 wicket-takers were English, 2 of whom were uncapped).

The Aussies are rightly renowned for their endless stable of all-rounders; producing 7 of the 15 all-rounders – compared to just 3 English players (Gibson, Sciver-Brunt and A. Jones).

Similarly, only 6 of the top 20 run scorers were English and only 1 (Schofield) is uncapped. (Next on the list were Scrivens #21 and Griffiths #33). As noted in my previous article, despite all the investment the English system is totally failing to develop significant numbers of new batters.

Similarly, of the 12 bowlers taking 10+ wickets only 5 were English and just 3 (Davis, Arlott and Levick) were uncapped. Moving down the wicket-taking table, 19 bowlers took between 5-9 wickets with slightly better representation at this level from domestic uncapaped players (Gray, Pavely, McDonald-Gay and Corteen-Coleman).

Only 4 keepers scored more than 100 runs (3 non-English players: Redmayne; Mooney; and Bryce; plus Jones). (More on keepers who can’t bat in the next section.)

Finally, 34 out of 100 players were ‘low impact’. A good argument can be made that for some younger players mere participation is a valuable learning experience and it’s true that when teams are packed with International players and an innings lasts just 100 balls many players will have limited opportunities to make an impression. Nevertheless, this still seems a very high proportion.

In summary, the tournament was dominated by international players (with non-English international players very much in the ascendancy) and very few uncapped players made a credible case for higher honours. Most worryingly, squad depth – as illustrated by squad deployment – is extremely thin.

Turning to the CEC …

All-rounders: 100+ runs and 7+ wickets or keepers with 100+ runs. The criteria for low impact players is far less onerous than for The Hundred: 0-1 wickets and <60 runs.

With only a sprinkling of overseas players and limited appearances by England players, the CEC provides a platform for domestic players to shine.

Most of the small number of international players participating did well; the Aussies providing 4 of the 11 all-rounders. A further 3 of the all-rounders were keepers, starkly highlighting the domestic system’s failure to produce batting/bowling all-rounders.

Another phenomenon is the continuing existence of keepers who can’t bat. Even allowing for the higher prevalence of slow bowling in the women’s game (which arguably means superior keeping skills can compensate for weaker batting) it seems an untenable anachronism that there were 4 keepers who averaged less than 8.5 with the bat. (NB Any good upcoming young batters with ‘good hands’ would be well advised to consider becoming a batter-keeper to maximise their prospects.)

But what’s been apparent for several years is the uneven spread of talent across the 8 teams. Take the bottom 4 teams …

Thunder’s team composition was very volatile which partly explains the high number of low impact players (more players playing a small number of games). But they had just 1(!) bowler with more than 7 wickets (F. Morris with 9). And whilst they do have several players capable of chipping in with wickets – unfortunately none displayed much batting prowess. With only 3 players scoring more than 100 runs (plus one other scoring 75 runs), Thunder’s tail effectively starts at 5. By any metric this is a weak team – but, notwithstanding this lack of batting and bowling strength, there were 3 teams beneath them!

Northern Diamonds tends to do better in the longer game – although they were CEC runners up in 2021. The younger generation has been brought up on T20, but only 2 domestic batters with 60+ runs (Heath and Armitage) had a SR of 100+. Heath was denied the gloves on occasions and unless she improves rapidly, I predict she risks being usurped as England keeper-in-waiting by Bryce switching her allegiance post the world cup. The bowling attack is skilled, but shallow, and Slater stands out as the best emerging talent.

Western Storm have long struggled to develop or attract talent to the south-west (which may not bode well for Somerset’s Tier 1 recruitment prospects). Knight scored most runs (155) in just 3 games which tells its own story (all other teams had at least 2 batters with more runs than this – and Sparks had 5) although one bright spot was Corney. However, of batters scoring 60+ runs, only Knight and Wellington had a SR of 100+. Only 3 bowlers took 7+ wickets; Smale being the domestic success. And Storm’s decision to play Wong and Anderson (neither of whom could get a game for their employer, Sparks) over their local talent reflects a lack of viable options.

And finally, Sunrisers. Sunrisers utilised the smallest number of players and surprisingly had 5 batters with 100+ runs; although their top 2 run scorers (Gardner and Scrivens) had SRs of 108 making it hard to post imposing targets. The resurgent Villiers, Gray and Munro were the only bowlers to take more than 7 wickets, although only Munro’s SR suggested a degree of penetration.

But here’s the most worrying statistic: 30 of the 126 players who made an appearance met the (unchallenging) criteria for low impact players. Whilst injuries and limited appearances partly explain this number 18 of this 30 are currently-contracted players.

Quite simply, the current talent pool isn’t deep enough to meet the current requirement for professional players, yet Project Darwin will see each of the 8 Tier 1 teams recruit 15 players (in addition to which Yorkshire is apparently assembling a team in preparation for becoming Tier 1 in 2026).

Put another way, that’s over 50 more contracted professionals.

For women’s cricket to grow standards in Tier 1 need to be uniformly high – both to prove the sceptics wrong but, more importantly, to ensure that the first impressions of those coming to the game will be positive (since a few disappointing experiences would be hard to subsequently change). A rational ECB realising this and looking at the data should have decided to start with 6 Tier 1 counties and specified the conditions (spectator/viewer numbers, broadcast/sponsorship revenues, etc.) which would need to be met before Tier 1 was expanded without pre-determining what the end state (timescales and number of Tier 1 teams) must be.

A successor article will illustrate why prioritising optics and selective narratives and mandating how many and which clubs will ascend to Tier 1 (and by when) is both sub-optimal and risks doing significant harm to the women’s game.

This week:

• NZ & England’s contrasting approaches to captaincy succession planning
• World Cup squads: Australia go pace-heavy, England put their trust in spin
• Why did Grace Scrivens & Kirstie Gordon miss out on Ireland selection?
• Chaos in the RHF as regions become counties
• What should Jay Shah do in his first 6 months in office?

England have announced their squads to tour Ireland in September and to contest the World Cup in UAE in October – with one notable omission.

Despite the fact that the Ireland squad seems tilted towards experience over youth (Georgia Adams and Mady Villiers are both included, while Kate Cross will captain), England coach Jon Lewis confirmed on Tuesday that Kirstie Gordon has opted out of the tour:

“We had a discussion with her, around multiple different scenarios that could play out for her in the future.”

“We came to the conclusion that the right thing at this point in time was to focus in on playing domestic cricket and then potentially come and play for England further down the line in other series or tournaments.”

Gordon already has 6 England caps, but the key factor was probably that the Ireland tour directly clashes with the last group-stage match and the semi-finals of the Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy.

With Blaze currently in fifth place and all still to play for, Gordon is likely focused on ensuring that her team, the Blaze, have the best chance of winning the last ever RHF.

Interestingly, though, it seems that her conversation with ECB Director of Women’s Cricket Jonathan Finch also involved proud Scot Gordon raising the question of a possible return to her home nation. “I’m pretty sure [Scotland] was [part of the conversation],” Lewis said.

Gordon last represented England in July 2019 and, under ICC regulations, would now be immediately eligible to play for Scotland should she choose to do so.

Lewis, though, said that England have promised Gordon a return to England colours “down the line in other series or tournaments” – presumably as a nice carrot to prevent her head being turned by the historic chance to represent Scotland in their first ever World Cup appearance.

This week:

• Selection dilemmas for England ahead of the World Cup
• Will England look to the next gen against Ireland?
• As Zimbabwe join the ICC Championship, is the schedule becoming too congested?
• Scotland, Thailand & Netherlands left out in the cold again by the ICC

This week:

• Spirit beat Fire in a thrilling Hundred final at Lord’s
• Where will the World Cup be moved to & what does that mean for England’s plans?
• Scotland due to host the 2026 Commonwealth Games, but will it involve women’s cricket?
• Our thoughts on Yorkshire’s new coach

As with Invincibles in the Eliminator yesterday, so with Fire today – failure to put quite enough runs on the board in the 1st innings, and in particular a post-powerplay lull in the Early Middle phase, made it too easy for a London Spirit side that have looked workmanlike at best, but nonetheless claimed the prize because that’s all they needed to be.

Georgia Redmayne won player of the match; Deepti Sharma struck the winning six; but it was Dani Gibson that was perhaps the key player for Spirit. We gave her both barrels for her bowling yesterday, as she conceded 38 runs (one of the worst bowling returns in the history of the competition) and she didn’t have the best outing with the ball today either (0-16 from 10 balls) but she made up for it with the bat.

With the Heather Knight / Georgia Redmayne partnership having gone undefeated on the way to victory yesterday yesterday, it looked for all the world like we were heading the same way again, with Spirit on 50-2 at the half-way point in the chase.

Intriguingly though, WinHer had the Fire edging it 56%-44%, and if Fire could break the Knight/ Redmayne partnership, you felt they had a real chance to win the game; so when Shabnim Ismail returned to castle Heather Knight, that meant Gibson walking out to the middle with the match on a knife-edge. But the only edge was a slightly streaky single for Gibson’s first run.

Gibson then timed her next delivery from Ismail perfectly through backward point for 4, using the South African’s pace against her, before hitting the next for another boundary to midwicket. The change of ends meant Redmayne held the strike until the final two deliveries of the following set, which Gibson again struck for a brace of fours off Hayley Matthews. The first ball of the next set, bowled by Freya Davies? Another 4 – 5 consecutive boundaries in all.

Gibson became Ismail’s 3rd and final victim shortly after, but the 22 off 9 balls she’d added had turned a tricky chase into a canter for the batters who came in after her, with Deepti playing exactly the same smart cricket that Redmayne and Knight had in the Eliminator, knowing exactly what she needed to do, and waiting for the right time to strike the big shot which carried Spirit over the finish line. And who else would it be out there with Deepti when she hit the winning runs at Lord’s but Charlie Dean?

Like Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Terminator, where (spoiler alert!) the villain from the first film returns as the hero for the second, Deepti turned her story around, winning over a Lord’s crowd of over 22,000 with the biggest cheer of the afternoon as she hoisted the trophy high on the podium after the match.

It has been a fascinating Hundred in the Women’s Competition, with the feeling that any one of 5 sides could have won it. London Spirit lost 3 games and scraped through to the Eliminator in 3rd place; but both Oval Invincibles and Welsh Fire lost 2 games apiece, so neither had dominated the way Brave did last season. In the end, it became a test of nerve and a test of smarts, and that’s where Spirit had the edge – beating teams that they had lost to in the group stages because they held their nerve and remembered their smarts when it really mattered.

A second unbeaten half-century of this 2024 Women’s Hundred from Georgia Redmayne took London Spirit to victory with 9 balls to spare – a pretty comfortable margin in this shortest of all short forms of the game – in The Annihilator Terminator Eliminator at The Oval.

Redmayne wasn’t supposed to be the “Big Name” in the London Spirit XI – that was Meg Lanning, with over 200 caps and more than 8,000 international runs. In contrast, Redmayne has zero caps, and zero international runs, having spent her 20s combining cricket with completing her medical training to qualify as a doctor. But for once, the Megastar has been eclipsed, with Redmayne outscoring her by 195 runs to 166 in the tournament so far.

The Doc played a patient innings (yes… I went there… for more puns of this quality follow my TikTok*!) and had to wait until the final moment to secure her half-century after Heather Knight almost snatched the opportunity from her, hitting out at the death. With 2 needed off 10 balls for the win, and 1 short of the fifty, Redmayne finally got the strike back from Knight, who had faced most of the previous couple of sets, and drove Alice Capsey through the covers for the runs she and Spirit needed. 53 off 47 balls isn’t a huge Strike Rate, but it didn’t matter – it was enough to win the game, and that’s all that counts – Spirit are heading back north of the river for tomorrow’s final with a spring in their step.

Oval Invincibles ultimately paid the price for a sluglish Early Middle phase, scoring just 19 runs between balls 25 and 50. In fact, if it hadn’t been for Dani Gibson giving them 3 gifts it would have been far worse.

The gift of gold came in the 2nd set, bowled by Gibson, which went for 16 runs – the most expensive set of the match; but it was followed by frankincense (9 off balls 70-75) and myrrh (13 off 85-90) as Heather Knight inexplicably persisted with Gibson, even though Tara Norris had bowled only 5 balls (conceding 5) leaving her with 15 still unused at the end. Heather Knight backing “her” players can be admirable; but sometimes it veers into obstinacy, and that’s how it looked today – Gibson was almost twice as expensive as Spirit’s next bowler, Charlie Dean – conceding 2.53 runs per ball, to Dean’s 1.2.

With precious few runs to play with, Invincibles played their trump card – Marizanne Kapp – early and often, hoping for the wickets they needed to get back into the match. Kapp was bowled out with half the match remaining, and I think Rosa hits the nail on the head identifying the problem with this:

Once Kapp was through, Heather Knight and Georgia Redmayne knew that all they needed to do was keep rotating the strike, hitting the odd bad ball to the boundary, and the win would come without them having to take too many risks.

Sure, there were some dropped catches as they made their way towards their target – Invincibles made it easier for them than it might have been – but basically the game was won by the halfway point in the Spirit innings, as long as they played it smart, and there are few people smarter in cricket than Heather Knight and Dr Georgia Redmayne.

———————–

* I don’t have a TikTok – sorry.