England ground out the ugliest of ugly wins – Heather Knight admitting post-match that “it’s not going to be sexy all the time” – in their first match of the World Cup in Sharjah, beating Bangladesh by 21 runs.

England 118-7 v Bangladesh 97-7 #T20WC

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-10-05T16:57:54.727Z

Having chosen to bat, England got off to a decent start – 47 is by a fair distance the most runs scored in the powerplay in the 4 matches to have taken place so far at Sharjah. Maia Bouchier showed a willingness to go on the offensive in tough conditions – she looked disappointed after getting caught on the ring, but 23 off 18 balls was job done for her.

England 118-7 v Bangladesh #T20WC

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-10-05T15:27:31.515Z

But England then seriously slumped thereafter, making just 44 runs in the following 10 overs as Bangladesh’s spinners pegged England back. Wyatt-Hodge battled her way to a run-a-ball 41, but struggled to get value for her shots. With long boundaries in place for this tournament, and the ball plugging in the outfield, anything that bounced more than a couple of times was running out of breath before it got to the rope.

The openers aside, the rest of England’s batters couldn’t deal with Bangladesh’s spinners, who kept them stuck in the crease – unable to move their feet much, and oddly reluctant to sweep.

Alice Capsey in particular looked like she was playing a game of The Floor is Lava in reverse (The Floor is Glue?) fending delivery after delivery back to the bowler, before being caught off a reverse sweep by one of the not-one-but-two fielders in place for that shot.

This isn’t entirely her fault though – coming in at 5 really isn’t where she is going to be at her best. I understand why England do this – to try to ensure that Nat Sciver-Brunt is batting in the overs in which she is likely to be at her most productive, after the powerplay, but while the ball is still newish. NSB has no doubt the right to have others juggled around to accommodate her; and to be fair, Capsey has repeatedly insisted that it isn’t a problem for her; but it leaves her in her own personal No Man’s Land in the middle order where she obviously isn’t comfortable, and her coming in earlier might have averted that middle overs slump.

Fortunately for England, they were able to up the rate in the final phase, helped by a Sophie Ecclestone Special – 8 off 2 balls, after hitting her first ball for the only 6 of England’s innings.

The interesting aspect to this game for England was going to be how the bowling went, with the decision to go with 4 specialist spinners, including Linsey Smith playing her first World Cup game since the group stages of the 2018 tournament in the West Indies, and her first England game not against New Zealand since 2019. In contrast with her other recent outings for England, Smith had the chance to operate in her preferred role, getting the new ball in the powerplay.

She didn’t quite find her rhythm in her first over, but she then switched ends and things fell into place. The ball that got Rani wasn’t the best Smith has ever bowled – it invited a shot that Rani just didn’t quite have the power to cash in on, caught by Ecclestone at mid off – but what followed was 5 tight deliveries to complete a wicket maiden, and set the pattern for Smith to fully justify her selection as she finished with 2-11 off 4 overs – half the Economy Rate of the rest of England’s attack.

England 118-7 v Bangladesh 97-7 #T20WC

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-10-05T16:58:24.328Z

Bangladesh’s innings was a mirror image of England’s – after a limp powerplay, they outscored England 59-44 in the middle overs, but still left themselves with too much to do at the death to be in with a shot of winning, and they ended up shutting-up shop a bit towards the end. What they did achieve was getting close enough that their Net Run Rate didn’t take too much of a hammering, unlike Sri Lanka against Australia earlier in the day.

England will need to do better than they did today if they are going to beat South Africa and top the group, which (now that India have already lost a match) will presumably be the way to avoid Australia in the semi-finals; but for now it is a win and 2 points and that’s what matters.

By Martin Saxon

Leigh, who last won the title in 2022, won their second Cheshire League title in three years, seeing off a challenge from last year’s winners Didsbury, who finished 12 points behind; and Nantwich, who were a further eight adrift. Both of the challenger clubs at least had the consolation of winning a senior T20 trophy during the year.

We’ll never know what might have happened had there not been three washed out matches between the top three during the year. This included a cancellation of the potential winner takes all final match between Leigh and Didsbury.

There has now only been one occasion in the last 14 years where a club has retained the league championship.

Leigh’s star players included Kirsten Smith with the bat and Sophie Heaton with the ball, but it’s highly likely that they wouldn’t have claimed top spot without the close season acquisition of Ellie Mason, who hit 672 runs at an average of 112 and added 18 wickets at 17 apiece for good measure. 

Didsbury’s Pooja Singh was the leading wicket taker with 22.

In the early weeks of the season, it seemed that newly promoted Lindow might be strong challengers, but they eventually faded to finish fourth. Their opener Heidi Cheadle finished as the top run scorer in Division 1 with 674, two more than Mason’s final total.

Four times title winners Appleton drop out of the top flight for the first time after a difficult season, and will be replaced by Leyland. After two third placed finishes in 2022 and 2023, Leyland stormed to the Division 2 title, ending with a 100 percent record, while all of their potential challengers lost at least three matches.The only other divisional winners with an unblemished record were Elworth in Division 5 South and Romiley in Division 5 East.

This is the final list of winners and runners-up across the CWCL competitions.

	WINNERS	RUNNERS UP
Division 1	Leigh	Didsbury
Division 2	Leyland	Upton
Division 3 West	Nantwich 2nd XI	Alvanley
Division 3 East	Didsbury 2nd XI	Stockport Georgians 2nd XI
Division 4 West	Oakmere 2nd XI	Kingsley
Division 4 East	Stockport Georgians 3rd XI	Stockport
Division 4 South East	Macclesfield	New Mills & High Peak North
Division 5 West	Old Parkonians	Neston
Division 5 East	Romiley	Macclesfield 2nd XI
Division 5 Mid Cheshire	Runcorn	Northwich
Division 5 South	Elworth	Christleton
T20 Divisional Competition	Nantwich Vipers	Lindow
Senior Knockout Cup	Didsbury Swordettes	Lindow
Development Knockout Cup	Didsbury 2nd XI	Chester BH 2nd XI
Softball Knockout Cup	Old Parkonians & Neston (Final not completed)

Lalit Modi, the India businessman who kick-started the IPL, has publically rubbished the ECB’s valuations of The Hundred teams in a post on The Social Network Formerly Known As Twitter, backing up his arguments by publishing the confidential team-by-team revenue projections issued by the ECB.

Modi writes that the ECB’s revenue projections are “disconnected from reality” and argues that the teams are worth only between £5m and £25m – less than half of what the ECB are believed to be holding out for.

Modi believes that increasing the projected earnings from domestic TV deals from £58m to £85m is “plausible” but that the expected income from overseas TV rights is unrealistic, and that the idea that there could be a big increase in sponsorship income is “wishful thinking”.

There’s a lot to digest here, but let’s start with possibly the only thing Modi is wrong about: domestic TV revenues. Given the state of the UK economy,which is projected to become poorer than Poland in terms of per-capita income by the end of the decade, it feels unlikely that Sky will have that kind of additional money to throw at a sport where they are likely to be the only serious bidder. If the rights end up increasing by even half of the 50% Modi is suggesting is “plausible” (and to be fair, he only says “plausible” and not “likely”) that would be a huge surprise.

On overseas TV rights Modi is almost certainly correct – the networks aren’t going to pay big bucks for a franchise comp that has no big stars in the men’s tournament. The ECB might argue that once they get the money from the sale, they will be able to afford some more superstars, but that’s a chicken-and-egg argument: they can only afford the big stars if they sell the teams for a lot of money; but if there are no overseas stars, the teams won’t be worth that much, and they won’t be able to afford those top players.

As for sponsorship, the ECB is constantly struggling to keep its current sponsors on-board – the idea that someone is going to come along and give them “Barclays” Premier League kind of money is for the fairies.

It is worth bearing in mind that Modi may not be a disinterested party here – he could be “just commenting”; but he (or friends of his) could also stand to gain from low-balling the ECB on the team sales if they are planning to invest nonetheless.

Whatever the case, the ECB needs to wake up and realise that these are the kinds of people you are trying to get into bed with – people who will publically throw cold water on your proposals by shamelessly leaking confidential documents and daring the ECB to do anything about it. Of course – sources leaked the tender documents for Tier 1, including to us; but they did it anonymously, because they realised that they were taking a risk by doing so. But Modi knows he is taking no such risk – it was a power move – Modi is saying: ‘I can leak your confidential documents and there is nothing you can do about it!’ The ECB should sue, but won’t. In which case, we know where all the power lies if we continue down this road and (clue!) it isn’t with the ECB.

After 5 seasons of Regionals, the Final Final ended in a deluge of rain with a win by 27 runs for Sunrisers on DLS.

Champions 🏆

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-09-21T15:42:01.085Z

The team that won no 50-over games in 2020; none in 2021; and none in 2022 – changing captains and coaches along the way – started to turn things around in 2023, getting their first RHF Trophy win against reigning champions Vipers on the opening day of the season. But it wasn’t until they appointed their 4th captain at the back end of 2023 that the gears really began to shift.

Grace Scrivens was just 19 when she was appointed captain in September 2023, but had already skippered Kent and England A. Leaders like Scrivens don’t come along very often – the last one that came from Essex caused the Romans a bit of bother back in AD61, burning Colchester to the ground in the process. Fortunately for the rest of us, Scrivens kept her warfare on the cricket pitch, with Sunrisers winning their last 4 games of the 2023 season to finish in 4th place, missing out on a semi-final place by just 5 points.

To say that ‘The tide had turned’ however would not be accurate – it would imply a degree of inevitability which in reality did not exist. In the group stages Sunrisers only just won more games than they lost – winning 7 and losing 6, and scraping into the semi-finals at the last gasp. But what they did do was win the games that mattered – the final ‘must-win’ group game against Vipers; a tough semi-final versus Diamonds; and now the final against Stars. Those are the games that you win by believing you can win; and that comes from leadership.

Of course, leadership alone isn’t enough – you have to back that up on the pitch as well, and Scrivens did so today – bowling 8.2 overs  at an Economy Rate of 2.5 and then adding a cool, calm 39* before the rains came to finish the game. But in neither case was Scrivens quite ‘leading from the front’. Asked about her style of captaincy following the trophy presentation, she had this to say:

“You’ve got to back your players and try and build good relationships with them, set roles and stick with them. It’s about sticking with players, and then they come out and deliver. Giving belief into players and trusting in them.”

She did that today, with Cordelia Griffith – allowing her to take the initiative from the moment she entered the fray in the second over.

Stars 212 v Sunrisers 121-3 (T: 95) #RHF

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-09-21T15:23:33.915Z

Griffith reached 50 having faced twice as many balls as Scrivens, with the captain happy to turn over the strike to the player in form, putting Sunrisers well ahead of the rate required to maintain a “lead” on DLS, even if they lost a couple of wickets, which they ultimately did.

Remarkably, Griffith said afterwards that she wasn’t even aware that rain was threatening: “I had no idea rain was coming – it just so happened that I was given enough balls to put away and get ahead of the rate early.” You can bet that Scrivens knew though – the DLS par was after all literally writ-large in front of their faces, on the big electronic scoreboard in the corner of the ground. But again, that’s true leadership – Scrivens wasn’t shouldering the strike, but she was carrying the responsibility of worrying about the rain and keeping that from her partner so that she was free to play her game without those worries.

Another crucial player for Sunrisers, both today and through the season, was Lissy MacLeod. MacLeod has been around the block a few times – she won the first ever Kia Super League with Vipers, back in 2016 (and the second with Western Storm the following year) and has now added a winner’s medal in the final RHF Trophy, 8 years later. The weight of runs she scored this season (just over 200) might not be up there with Scrivens (553) or Griffith (420); but without the 50 she made in the de-facto quarter-final against Vipers, Sunrisers would not even have been here.

Equally, a 12 not out today from Macleod might not seem much, but at the stage she came in the most important things were a) support Scrivens, the set batter; and b) not get out, which would have made the DLS a lot closer. And she did both (a) and (b).

With the ball, both Kate Coppack and Jodi Grewcock finished the tournament with 19 wickets for Sunrisers; with the former starring today, getting a bit of swing early on, and a little (just enough) bite off the pitch later, to take 4-27. Getting rid of Alexa Stonehouse, and newly capped England player Paige Scholfield early-doors, combined with the run out of Bryony Smith (which goes down on the scorecard as ‘Run Out (Villiers)’ but should really be ‘Run Out (Bryony Smith)’ such was her own culpability) meant that the big hitters in Stars’ lineup – the ones that could have got them to a much more intimidating 250+ – were eliminated from the equation. Alice Davidson-Richards did a magnificent job, and was rewarded afterwards with the Player of the Tournament medal from the PCA’s MVP computer, but she is the anchor not the cannon, so without the big hitting going on around her, Stars ended up well short of par.

Stars 212 v Sunrisers #RHF

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-09-21T12:22:25.198Z

Stars will no doubt lament that if the rain hadn’t come, they could have… would have… should have… worn Sunrisers down, and might have been able to bowl them out, which is realistically what they’d have needed to do – the required rate at 25 overs was under 4, so Sunrisers would have made it unless they’d been dismissed. But… them’s the breaks – the rains came, leaving the players watching puddles forming from the dressing room balcony before officials finally confirmed the abandonment and the result. The yelps of delight from the Sunrisers players could be heard from across the ground in the press box. They might not have been the best team through the season, but they won the games that mattered. That’s how competitions work, and for that reason their joy was thoroughly deserved.

By Josh Cockburn

While England men seem to pick their teams primarily on height and vibes, the increased use of data in cricket means that we do have a lot more information that we can rely on to assess players. Of course there are lies, damned lies and statistics and you need to watch games not just scorecards and spreadsheets to judge players, but over time I’d rather have the batters with the best strike rates not the best looking cover drives.

I have combined all performances from the Women’s Hundred, WBBL, WPL and CWPL as well as international matches played by England, Australia, India, West Indies, South Africa and New Zealand in the last 12 months (from August 2023 to August 2024). I’ve not included Pakistan, Bangladesh or any other country with no representation in those leagues as we only have their international averages which are easily available. I’ve not done Sri Lanka either, but I have done Chamari Athapaththu given the amount of cricket around the world she has played.

I’ve not included the Charlotte Edwards Cup, WNCL, SuperSmash or any other leagues which are overwhelmingly competed for without high quality overseas players. There are some issues with comparing between leagues – the WPL was considerably faster scoring than the CPL, but broadly speaking the standards are similar – the CPL might have had the weakest overseas player contingent, but the international players who did compete there didn’t do substantially better there than they did in the other leagues – because it was lower scoring the bowlers tended to improve their figures while the batters saw theirs deteriorate. It’s less useful for analysing players who haven’t played international cricket and only played in one franchise league – especially those who did very well in that league like Lauren Smith or Amy Edgar in the WBBL or Freya Davies in the Hundred.

For the international data I’ve included all players who have batted or bowled at least 12 times or though I’ve included a few players in the national discussions with slightly less appearances.

England

Squad	Innings	Runs	Balls	Avg	SR
S Ecclestone	19	153	106	13.91	144.34
D Gibson	26	353	251	20.76	140.64
A Jones	36	585	425	20.17	137.65
D Wyatt	22	577	425	27.48	135.76
N Sciver-Brunt	20	967	731	53.72	132.28
H Knight	40	1005	803	38.65	125.16
M Bouchier	38	722	592	19.51	121.96
S Dunkley	31	491	421	16.93	116.63
A Capsey	46	1046	924	23.24	113.20
B Heath	23	225	201	11.25	111.94
F Kemp	18	131	120	8.73	109.17
C Dean	13	130	126	14.44	103.17
Contenders
P Scholfield	8	190	138	27.14	137.68
C Griffith	10	100	77	10.00	129.87
T Beaumont	25	531	449	22.13	118.26
G Scrivens	8	157	139	19.63	112.95
G Adams	13	101	112	11.22	90.18
H Armitage	8	62	69	7.75	89.86
B Smith	20	192	220	9.60	87.27

Squad	Innings	Balls	Runs	Wickets	Avg	ER
S Glenn	29	577	565	41	13.78	5.88
S Ecclestone	28	612	668	40	16.70	6.55
L Smith	22	470	516	28	18.43	6.59
A Capsey	21	296	343	16	21.44	6.95
C Dean	27	516	604	26	23.23	7.02
H Knight	13	150	180	5	36.00	7.20
L Bell	21	416	500	26	19.23	7.21
N Sciver-Brunt	28	491	609	25	24.36	7.44
D Gibson	35	588	760	25	30.40	7.76
F Kemp	12	173	271	9	30.11	9.40
Contenders
F Davies	8	140	132	11	12.00	5.66
R Slater	8	105	114	5	22.80	6.51
L Filer	13	247	276	10	27.60	6.70
M Villiers	9	132	149	6	24.83	6.77
K Levick	7	129	154	10	15.40	7.16
So. Smale	9	151	181	9	20.11	7.19
C Pavely	7	135	162	9	18.00	7.20
G Adams	15	188	227	9	25.22	7.24
E Gray	10	135	164	9	18.22	7.29
R MacDonald-Gay	9	140	175	8	21.88	7.50
H Baker	7	110	141	4	35.25	7.69
G Davis	8	140	180	10	18.00	7.71
E Arlott	7	135	185	11	16.82	8.22
M Corteen-Coleman	8	135	186	6	31.00	8.27
K Cross	10	170	235	8	29.38	8.29
K Gordon	8	140	194	3	64.67	8.31

England’s batting problems are fairly obviously at the top of the order. Wyatt’s figures are fine, but neither Bouchier or Dunkley have great figures – you’d probably be tempted to go with Bouchier as the marginally faster scorer. Tammy Beaumont has very similar figures to them both, I guess England have gone for Dunkley’s room to improve over Beaumont’s experience. Winfield-Hill had a poor 12 months, and doesn’t look like she’s in line for a comeback. Then Alice Capsey at 3 where a player renowned for fast scoring has spent a year with the lowest SR of any front line batter. England really need her to rediscover some of that uninhibited hitting as they don’t need solidity from number 3, they need dynamism.

Sciver-Brunt’s brilliance goes without saying at number 4. Knight’s had the best 12 months of her T20 career in my opinion, able to score fast as well as heavily. Previously you’d be reassured by her coming in at a crisis but not excited by her coming in with the run rate needing boosting, but she’s fulfilled both roles this year. From those who haven’t been selected, Paige Scholfield has much the best record and probably should be next in line for a batting place.

Amy Jones has done really well and has exactly the sort of figures you’d hope for from your number 6. For the all rounder slot, Danni Gibson outperforms Freya Kemp by a mile in batting terms (we’ll come to bowling shortly).

Also worth noting is that Ecclestone’s SR is one of the best in the world. Stats can be deceiving, and we’ve seen occasions when she’s been promoted and she’s looked a bit hapless, but her boundary striking ability shouldn’t be underestimated – she clearly doesn’t herself judging by when she’s come in to bat for Originals this summer.

Looking at the bowling, it’s clear why England have gone spin heavy, and it’s not just anticipating spin friendly pitches in Bangladesh then UAE. With the exception of Davies and Filer (neither of whom made the squad), basically every spinner that England might choose from (including Georgia Adams and Katie Levick who aren’t really part of the conversation as well as Capsey’s part-time spin) is more economical than the seamers. This isn’t something inherent to T20, brought about by fast bowlers bowling more in powerplays and at the death or something, it’s not the case for India or Australia. For whatever reasons, England’s spinners are better than their seamers at T20 currently.

Ecclestone and Glenn have world class figures – especially Glenn who is in the top 5 in the world for both average and economy. I don’t think Glenn gets enough recognition for the quality of her performances, hopefully she can demonstrate it on a global stage at the World Cup. Linsey Smith clearly outperforms Charlie Dean for the third spinner. Dean being an off spinner may count ahead of playing a second left armer, but Capsey actually has better figures than Dean if England just need an offspin option for particular matchups.

As for the faster bowlers, Davies was very economical for the Fire in the Hundred, it’s a shame she didn’t play any international cricket or other franchise leagues to give us more data to judge her current level, and she didn’t have a great Charlotte Edwards Cup. Otherwise, in the choice between Lauren’s for the new ball, Bell has a much better average than Filer, and although Filer has the better economy rate you can see why England would value Bell’s ability to get wickets early on. Filer would clearly be a useful option to have and I’d be very surprised if she hadn’t been picked if a 16 player squad had been chosen. Kate Cross can’t have any complaints at her exclusion on her T20 form this year. Sciver-Brunt is a bit more expensive than you’d want as a second seamer, assuming she’s fit to take on that role. England had better hope she is, as neither Gibson or Kemp have figures that inspire confidence, both averaging over 30 this year and with high economy rates, (stratospheric in Kemp’s case) as well as their own fitness issues. Spin to win for England then.

Australia

Squad	Innings	Runs	Balls	Avg	SR
G Harris	30	795	511	31.80	155.58
G Wareham	31	575	409	26.14	140.59
A Healy	20	543	398	28.58	136.43
B Mooney	42	1397	1048	43.66	133.30
A Sutherland	28	573	433	23.88	132.33
P Litchfield	37	768	588	24.77	130.61
E Perry	40	1297	1007	41.84	128.80
T McGrath	30	624	525	24.96	118.86
A Gardner	39	666	577	18.50	115.42
A King	16	132	123	14.67	107.32
Contenders
L Harris	12	122	60	10.17	203.33
J Jonassen	33	462	352	14.00	131.25
M Lanning	30	785	641	27.07	122.46
K Mack	15	452	381	30.13	118.64
G Redmayne	27	589	560	23.56	105.18

Squad	Innings	Balls	Runs	Wickets	Avg	ER
K Garth	24	507	548	17	32.24	6.49
M Schutt	26	564	612	30	20.40	6.51
A Sutherland	37	717	780	40	19.50	6.53
S Molineux	13	300	328	18	18.22	6.56
A King	23	464	529	26	20.35	6.84
E Perry	26	365	419	31	13.52	6.89
G Wareham	43	841	1009	39	25.87	7.20
A Gardner	42	866	1081	51	21.20	7.49
T McGrath	22	291	377	17	22.18	7.77
G Harris	17	191	252	7	36.00	7.92
Contenders
L Smith	8	150	146	11	13.27	5.84
A Wellington	24	449	458	33	13.88	6.12
L Cheatle	21	443	473	28	16.89	6.41
A Edgar	15	286	322	20	16.10	6.76
H Graham	21	396	503	25	20.12	7.62
J Jonassen	38	780	970	52	18.65	7.46

For Australia, the two main talking points have been the inclusion of Brown and Vlaeminck despite practically no top-level cricket in the last year and the exclusion of Jess Jonassen. As this article is primarily a statistical analysis of top-level cricket in the last year, I can’t assess Brown and Vlaeminck’s inclusion except to note that at their best they are very dangerous bowlers and the do allow Australia that fabled point of difference. More crucially, the fact Australia have 6 other bowlers who conceded less than 7 runs an over in the last year, plus Wareham, Gardner and McGrath means that they have plenty of alternatives if the gamble doesn’t pay off.

On statistical grounds, Jonassen can’t really complain about her omission. Her economy rate is 23rd among all the Aussie bowlers in the sample, below 7 bowlers in the squad, and only above Gardner and McGrath. Her average is much better – only worse than Perry and Molineux in the squad, but only marginally better than her rivals for a place in the squad. Wellington has a much better claim to be in the squad/team for her bowling and although her batting isn’t as good, it’s perfectly fine for a number 8 or 9.

For the batting, Healy and Mooney are certain of their places and both had good seasons. Perry has had a really strong season too, speeding up her scoring while maintaining a high average. Depending on how many all-rounders Australia play, they may only choose one of Grace Harris or Litchfield. If that is the case then I suspect they might go for the younger player, though Harris probably has been the outstanding T20 batter of the year, one of only two batters to have a SR of over a run and a half per ball, while maintaining a decent average of 31. The only batter with a higher SR was her sister, Laura managing over 2 runs a ball which basically puts her on a different level to the rest of the women’s game at the moment. However, Laura Harris only just averaged over 10 and that’s not enough runs to get picked however fast they are scored, especially for Australia. There’s no-one else from out of the squad who has produced the sort of elite performances that would warrant inclusion as a batter – even Meg Lanning.

What I would question is whether either Tahlia McGrath or Ashleigh Gardner is worth their places in the team. Both are top all rounders of course, but in the past year they have been substantially out- performed by Perry, Sutherland and Wareham in both batting and bowling. McGrath is vice-captain and Gardner obviously has masses of credit in the bank so I’d be surprised if they don’t play, but on form I think Australia’s team should have looked something like this (assuming they include one of Brown or Vlaeminck). Cheatle and Schutt basically have identical economy rates over the year, but Cheatle has a better average.

Healy
Mooney
G Harris
Perry
Litchfield
Sutherland
Wareham
Wellington
Molineux
Cheatle/Schutt
Brown/Vlaeminck

India

Squad	Innings	Runs	Balls	Avg	SR
R Ghosh	27	616	435	32.42	141.61
Sh Verma	30	894	649	34.38	137.75
S Sajana	10	117	86	19.50	136.05
J Rodrigues	28	663	512	36.83	129.49
D Sharma	21	572	449	71.50	127.39
D Hemalatha	15	301	240	25.08	125.42
S Mandhana	35	999	808	31.22	123.64
Y Bhatia	9	240	197	26.67	121.83
H Kaur	35	863	738	31.96	116.94
P Vastrakar	16	100	117	9.09	85.47
Contenders
K Navgire	8	110	75	13.75	146.67
A Kaur	11	89	66	17.80	134.85
S Meghana	6	168	149	33.6	112.75
S Sehrawat	7	108	106	15.43	101.89

Squad	Innings	Balls	Runs	Wickets	Avg	ER
D Sharma	37	797	820	44	18.64	6.17
R Yadav	22	438	488	32	15.25	6.68
R Singh	25	522	600	21	28.57	6.90
P Vastrakar	29	542	630	31	20.32	6.97
S Patil	20	381	457	29	15.76	7.20
A Sobhana	13	222	267	16	16.69	7.22
A Reddy	12	243	304	11	27.64	7.51
H Kaur	11	107	136	9	15.11	7.63
Contenders
T Sadhu	9	162	147	9	16.33	5.44
T Kanwar	12	270	283	11	25.73	6.29
S Pandey	14	309	363	13	27.92	7.05
S Ishaque	12	210	270	14	19.29	7.71
R Gayakwad	10	203	265	9	29.44	7.83
M Singh	8	144	242	5	48.40	10.08

For India, Ghosh and Verma are their fastest batters and both average over 30 so they are obvious selections. Deepti has had an astonishingly good year in franchise cricket averaging over 100 and scoring at 134. International form has not been nearly as good, dragging her down to a mere average of 71 and SR of 127, but that’s still elite figures – it is bemusing that no-one picked her up in the WBBL draft. The rest of their batting is all very similar with SRs in the 120s (compared to the Aussies who are mainly in the 130s). Harmanpreet has only managed 116.94 so it’s less surprising she was passed over in the WBBL, though Mandhana is only slightly quicker. There’s not many alternatives out of the squad who have performed better. Kiran Navgire might have been worth a place as she scored at 146 even with a low average.

Among the bowlers, Sadhu is one of a handful of bowlers to have conceded less than a run a ball in T20 this year, and probably deserves a place. Tanuja Kanwar also put up some very good figures, but the competition for places among Indian bowlers is fierce. Deepti is world class again. Radha Yadav, Renuka Singh and Pooja Vastrakar all went at under 7 rpo, with Yadav having the best average. Patil and Sobhana were more expensive but still have very good averages. Probably the luckiest bowler to get in is Reddy but there’s not a huge queue of Indian seamers behind her – indeed Meghna Singh who might have been in the running in the past had a very poor tournament for Gujarat. Shihka Pandey could have come in for her though. India’s main issue is that (Deepti apart) they lack allrounders. Harmanpreet is the only batter who has bowled much this year, and only Vastrakar of the bowlers has had much batting. Vastrakar has traditionally been called upon when a bit of tail end hitting is required but she’s had a very bad season with the bat, averaging below 10 and scoring at below a run a ball.

West Indies

Squad	Innings	Runs	Balls	Avg	SR
H Matthews	27	1403	1149	34.22	122.11
D Dottin	5	119	109	23.80	109.17
S Taylor	9	216	211	27.00	102.37
A Alleyne	30	114	121	10.36	94.21
Q Joseph	10	151	161	15.10	93.79
S Campbelle	28	243	260	22.09	93.46
C Henry	21	49	62	9.80	79.03
C Nation	15	94	124	9.40	75.81

Squad	Innings	Balls	Runs	Wickets	Avg	ER
Q Joseph	10	192	173	9	19.22	5.41
A Fletcher	11	214	235	16	14.69	6.59
A Alleyne	15	268	296	15	19.73	6.63
C Henry	11	144	159	7	22.71	6.63
H Matthews	47	949	1124	56	20.07	7.11
K Ramharack	13	246	295	10	29.5	7.2
S Connell	11	162	221	10	22.10	8.19
Z James	9	96	151	2	75.5	9.44

You don’t need recourse to statistics to know the West Indies have problems with batting – but they do lay bare how deep the problems are. Taking Matthews out of the equation (and while her figures are fine they are a bit short of the best batters globally), none of their batters who have played enough qualifying innings manage to score at over a run a ball, and Campbelle is the only batter among them to average over 20. No surprise then that they are hoping Taylor and Dottin can roll back the years. The bowling looks much better, Fletcher and Joseph have fine figures, and Alleyne, Henry, Matthews and Ramharack are reasonably economical. The only qualifier is that a lot of those figures come from the low scoring CPL plus a middling international calendar (5 matches vs Pakistan, 3 apiece against Australia and Sri Lanka), only Matthews has been playing in the other leagues.

New Zealand

Squad	Innings	Runs	Balls	Avg	SR
S Devine	43	990	771	26.05	128.40
J Kerr	13	88	70	9.78	125.71
A Kerr	35	940	768	32.41	122.40
I Gaze	10	111	102	13.88	108.82
S Bates	31	580	579	20.00	100.17
M Green	15	190	199	19.00	95.48
B Halliday	11	162	174	16.20	93.10

Squad	Innings	Balls	Runs	Wickets	Avg	ER
F Jonas	14	294	339	11	30.82	6.92
E Carson	7	132	162	7	23.14	7.36
J Kerr	11	230	292	4	73.00	7.62
A Kerr	34	699	896	30	29.87	7.69
L Tahuhu	11	180	258	10	25.80	8.60
S Devine	34	536	773	27	28.63	8.65
H Rowe	9	114	181	5	36.20	9.53

New Zealand have obviously slipped in recent years with their great players retiring or declining and not being adequately replaced. Devine and Amelie Kerr both have respectable figures, but neither can manage the 130 SR that seems to be the elite level for women’s T20 at the moment. Bates sadly has dropped to mediocrity with a SR of just a run a ball and would surely be in line for being replaced was anyone else doing better, but the three other qualifying NZ batters (Gaze, Green and Halliday) all average sub-20 and only Gaze scores at (marginally) above a run a ball. Only Jonas averages under 7 rpo among the bowlers and Tahuhu, Devine and Rowe all average above 8.5. Carson and the Kerr sisters return respectable economy rates in the 7po range but nothing that would frighten the opposition. Jess Kerr may want to claim bragging rights for being above her sister for both SR and ER.

South Africa

Squad	Innings	Runs	Balls	Avg	SR
N De Klerk	13	154	113	25.67	136.28
C Tryon	33	592	465	21.93	127.31
M Kapp	36	720	568	24.83	126.76
L Wolvaardt	42	1378	1126	37.24	122.38
A Bosch	12	326	267	27.17	122.10
T Brits	16	527	443	35.13	118.96
S Luus	13	176	159	19.56	110.69
Unavailable
L Lee	13	409	280	37.18	146.07
M Du Preez	17	382	309	23.88	123.62

Squad	Innings	Balls	Runs	Wickets	Avg	ER
M Kapp	39	825	803	36	22.31	5.84
C Tryon	34	571	634	28	22.64	6.66
N Mlaba	17	300	353	9	39.22	7.06
M Klaas	14	248	305	10	30.50	7.38
N De Klerk	14	269	357	13	27.46	7.96
T Sekhukhune	7	132	186	7	26.57	8.45
A Khaka	10	212	309	3	103.00	8.75
Unavailable
S Ismail	29	640	619	35	17.69	5.80

South Africa with all their players available would be a very dangerous side. Kapp is probably the best T20 quick bowler in the world right now, averaging 22 and conceding less than a run a ball, but there’s not much penetration elsewhere. Mlaba, Tryon and Klaas are economical enough, but don’t take enough wickets (Tryon’s figures got a big boost by taking 8 wickets for 66 runs in the WCPL) while de Klerk, Sekhukhune and Khaka are all pretty expensive. Add Ismail’s 17.69 average and 5.8 ER and things suddenly would look much better.

In batting, Wolvaardt averages 37 and has shown improvements in scoring quicker but a strike rate of 122 makes her a good anchor, but needing runs to come fast at the other end. However, only de Klerk scored at faster than 130 with Tryon, Kapp and Bosch all in the 120s. Luus struggling with a SR of 110 and a sub 20 average doesn’t help. Getting Lizelle Lee back who averaged 37 with a SR of 146 in the WBBL surely would.

Conclusion

Now putting all the data together to find the most effective players in world T20 over the last year. Players in bold are in the World Cup squads.

Best Strike Rate

	Batter	Nat	Inns	Runs	BF	Avg	SR
1	L Harris	Aus	12	122	60	10.17	203.33
2	G Harris	Aus	30	795	511	31.80	155.58
3	L Lee	SA	13	409	280	37.18	146.07
4	S Ecclestone	Eng	19	153	106	13.91	144.34
5	R Ghosh	Ind	27	616	435	32.42	141.61
6	D Gibson	Eng	26	353	251	20.76	140.64
7	G Wareham	Aus	31	575	409	26.14	140.59
8	Sh Verma	Ind	30	894	649	34.38	137.75
9	A Jones	Eng	36	585	425	20.17	137.65
10	A Healy	Aus	20	543	398	28.58	136.43
11	N De Klerk	SA	13	154	113	25.67	136.28
12	D Wyatt	Eng	22	577	425	27.48	135.76
13	H Graham	Aus	19	276	204	21.23	135.29
14	C Knott	Aus	20	315	233	19.69	135.19
15	B Mooney	Aus	42	1397	1048	43.66	133.30
16	A Sutherland	Aus	28	573	433	23.88	132.33
17	N Sciver-Brunt	Eng	20	967	731	53.72	132.28
18	J Jonassen	Aus	33	462	352	14.00	131.25
19	P Litchfield	Aus	37	768	588	24.77	130.61
20	J Rodrigues	Ind	28	663	512	36.83	129.49

Dominated by Australians who fill half the top 20, England have 5 representatives, India 3.

Best Average

	Batter	Nat	Inns	Runs	BF	Avg	SR
1	D Sharma	Ind	21	572	449	71.50	127.39
2	N Sciver-Brunt	Eng	20	967	731	53.72	132.28
3	B Mooney	Aus	42	1397	1048	43.66	133.30
4	E Perry	Aus	40	1297	1007	41.84	128.80
5	H Knight	Eng	40	1005	803	38.65	125.16
6	L Wolvaardt	SA	42	1378	1126	37.24	122.38
7	L Lee	SA	13	409	280	37.18	146.07
8	J Rodrigues	Ind	28	663	512	36.83	129.49
9	E Villani	Aus	12	324	279	36.00	116.13
10	T Brits	SA	16	527	443	35.13	118.96
11	A Athapaththu	SL	51	1615	1317	35.11	122.63
12	S Verma	Ind	30	894	649	34.38	137.75
13	H Matthews	WI	47	1403	1149	34.22	122.11
14	R Ghosh	Ind	27	616	435	32.42	141.61
15	A Kerr	NZ	35	940	768	32.41	122.40
16	H Kaur	Ind	35	863	738	31.96	116.94
17	G Harris	Aus	30	795	511	31.80	155.58
18	S Mandhana	Ind	35	999	808	31.22	123.64
19	K Mack	Aus	15	452	381	30.13	118.64
20	T Wilson	Aus	13	323	273	29.36	118.32

This is much more widely spread around geographically and is probably closer to what most people would say are the best batters in women’s cricket, but it is debatable how useful it is to a T20 team to average over 30 if you are scoring at under 120. The best batters at the moment, appearing on both lists are Grace Harris, Richa Ghosh, Shafali Verma, Beth Mooney, Nat Sciver-Brunt and Jemima Rodrigues.

Best Economy Rate

		Nat	Inns	Balls	Runs	Wkts	AVG	ER
1	S Ismail	SA	29	640	619	35	17.69	5.80
2	A Wellington	Aus	29	563	546	38	14.37	5.82
3	M Kapp	SA	39	825	803	36	22.31	5.84
4	S Glenn	Eng	29	577	565	41	13.78	5.88
5	D Sharma	Ind	37	797	820	44	18.64	6.17
6	A Athapaththu	SL	43	745	778	37	21.03	6.27
7	T Kanwar	Ind	12	270	283	11	25.73	6.29
8	S Bates	Aus	14	312	330	5	66.00	6.35
9	L Cheatle	Aus	21	443	473	28	16.89	6.41
10	K Garth	Aus	24	507	548	17	32.24	6.49
11	M Schutt	Aus	26	564	612	30	20.40	6.51
12	A Sutherland	Aus	37	717	780	40	19.50	6.53
13	S Ecclestone	Eng	28	612	668	40	16.70	6.55
14	S Molineux	Aus	13	300	328	18	18.22	6.56
15	L Smith	Eng	22	470	516	28	18.43	6.59
16	J Barsby	Aus	12	168	186	7	26.57	6.64
17	C Tryon	SA	34	571	634	28	22.64	6.66
18	R Yadav	Ind	22	438	488	32	15.25	6.68
19	L Filer	Eng	13	247	276	10	27.60	6.70
20	A Edgar	Aus	15	286	322	20	16.10	6.76

The depth of Australian cricket illustrated here, with 5 bowlers here who didn’t make the squad, in addition to 4 who did. Again England come in second with 4 bowlers.

Best Average

		Nat	Inns	Balls	Runs	Wkts	AVG	ER
1	S Day	Aus	14	294	337	27	12.48	6.88
2	E Perry	Aus	26	365	419	31	13.52	6.89
3	S Glenn	Eng	29	577	565	41	13.78	5.88
4	A Wellington	Aus	29	563	546	38	14.37	5.82
5	R Yadav	Ind	22	438	488	32	15.25	6.68
6	S Patil	Ind	20	381	457	29	15.76	7.20
7	A Edgar	Aus	15	286	322	20	16.10	6.76
8	H Darlington	Aus	13	264	365	22	16.59	8.30
9	A Sobhana	Ind	13	222	267	16	16.69	7.22
10	S Ecclestone	Eng	28	612	668	40	16.70	6.55
11	L Cheatle	Aus	21	443	473	28	16.89	6.41
12	S Ismail	SA	29	640	619	35	17.69	5.80
13	S Molineux	Aus	13	300	328	18	18.22	6.56
14	L Smith	Eng	22	470	516	28	18.43	6.59
15	D Sharma	Ind	37	797	820	44	18.64	6.17
16	J Jonassen	Aus	38	780	970	52	18.65	7.46
17	L Bell	Eng	21	416	500	26	19.23	7.21
18	S Ishaque	Ind	12	210	270	14	19.29	7.71
19	N Hancock	Aus	17	373	446	23	19.39	7.17
20	A Sutherland	Aus	37	717	780	40	19.50	6.53

A bit of a theme developing as Australia dominate once more with 10 representatives, 7 of whom don’t make the squad. Averaging under 20 makes you a very useful bowler whatever your economy rate, but only Darlington and Ishaque went at over 7.5 an over.

The elite performers, appearing in both lists, Shabnim Ismail, Amanda Wellington, Sarah Glenn, Deepti Sharma, Lauren Cheatle, Annabel Sutherland, Sophie Ecclestone, Sophie Molineux, Linsey Smith, Radha Yadav and Amy Edgar.

Despite battling a bleeding hand, Orla Prendergast took two wickets and then hit a wonderful 80 off 51 balls to give England a big black eye in the final match of their tour of Ireland – the hosts winning with 1 ball to spare at Clontarf Cricket Club in Dublin.

England 169-8 v Ireland 170-5 #IREvENG

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-09-15T16:47:05.805Z

Having initially cut her hand playing for the Blaze in the RHF Trophy in England earlier in the month, the wound has literally been a running sore for Prendergast all week, and today it opened up again while she was fielding. With blood pouring out of her palm, the umpires insisted that she received treatment, and there was a lengthy delay whilst the medical staff patched her up before she was able to resume bowling.

To then come out and bat the best part of 20 overs showed her fighting spirit; to win the game for Ireland showed her class as a cricketer. Prendergast hit 13 fours, the majority through extra cover and mid off, manipulating the field as she went.

England 169-8 v Ireland 170-5 #IREvENG

— CRICKETher (@crickether.bsky.social) 2024-09-15T16:48:04.384Z

The key to Ireland’s victory was the 17th over – the biggest of the game – bowled by Charis Pavely. Going into the over, Ireland needed an increasing unlikely sounding 42 from 24 balls. After hitting a 4 off the second ball, Leah Paul turned the strike over to Prendergast with a single, and Prendergast stepped up to strike the last 3 balls of the over for boundaries. The first of those deliveries was a gimmie from Pavely – too short and too wide; but the second was only turned into a half-volley by brilliant footwork from Prendergast; and the third was just a very clean strike down the ground. Suddenly the ask was a much more realistic sounding 25 from 18, and the game was afoot.

Ireland didn’t make it easy for themselves though – keeping the fans watching on free-to-air TV on the edge of their sofas, Prendergast was bowled trying to cut a yorker from Kate Cross, leaving it once again a contest between Mady Villiers bowling the final over for England, and Ireland’s tail, just as it had been in Belfast when Ireland won the 3rd ODI.

Villiers stepped up, just as she had done earlier in the week, by applying the KISS principle – Keep It Simple, Stupid! Targeting the stumps, keeping her head as both Sarah Forbes and Ava Canning tried to charge her, she had them both bowled, leaving Ireland still needing 2 off 2, with the new batter – Christina Coulter-Reilly – at the crease.

Coulter-Reilly pulled the penultimate delivery straight back to Villiers with no power in the shot, and then set off for the single, having presumably been instructed to “Just Run”. Then, in echoes of the conclusion of the Sunrisers game at Chelmsford in 2022, which finished in a win for Western Storm after a wild overthrow from Villiers went for 4 off the final ball, Villiers hurled the ball at the stumps – it missed, there was no one backing up close enough to cut it off, and the crowd roared a roar far in excess of their actual number (a few hundred) to urge the batters to turn back for the second run and win the match.

Despite her frustrations, thumping the ground in disappointment, Villiers probably did the right thing – England needed the wicket if they wanted to win the game; and besides, England were only still in it thanks to the two wickets she had taken in the two previous deliveries. That’s the bit England should take note of, and as I wrote yesterday, Villiers should still have an England future based on her performances this tour.

For a couple of others, it looks likely that this was their final game for England. Paige Scholfield finished the tour on which she made her debut on a little high, with her highest score for her country – 34 off 21 balls – and if she finishes her career with just those 5 England caps, it is still 5 more caps than I (or most other people) ever got – she should be proud. Ditto Georgia Adams, who looked more settled today, making 23 off 15, as she made her second (and again presumably, final) appearance in an England shirt.

I continue to think that Seren Smale has more caps in front of her than anyone else on this tour, but she had an error-strewn day behind the stumps which made us once again realise how much we’ll miss Amy Jones when she hangs up her gloves. For almost 20 years, England have gone into most matches with the best wicketkeeper in the world – first Sarah Taylor, then Jones. Whether her successor is Smale or Bess Heath, or Ann Nicola Other, they just aren’t going to be that, at least at first, and we’re all going to have to get used to it!

But we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that a tough defeat to take for England was a glorious moment for Ireland, and I genuinely think their players reacted with more joy to the win than Australia’s did when they won the last T20 World Cup! They’ve taken a couple of beatings recently – from Scotland in the T20 World Cup qualifier (denying them a spot on the plane to the UAE), and from England in the 2nd ODI and yesterday’s T20; but they have bounced back bravely, come out fighting, and come out winners again today. As I write this, I can still hear whoops of celebration coming from the nearby pavilion bar at Clontarf Cricket Club. They are thoroughly deserved.